Home » Africa, Economy, Financial Crisis » Liechtenstein GDP Larger than 14 African States Combined


Liechtenstein GDP Larger than 14 African States Combined

 
 
 
 
 
submit to reddit

Liechtenstein (population 37,000) has a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) larger than 14 African states, while Belgium (pop. 11m) and Australia (pop. 24m) have a GDP larger than 41 African states and their population of more than 990 million all added together—definitive proof that achievement is linked to race, and not “environment.”

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is a measure of the value of economic activity within a country—the sum of the market values, or prices, of all final goods and services produced in an economy during a period of time.

According to GDP data issued by the World Bank, and population figures provided from the United Nations, the combined GDP of 41 sub-Saharan African states are as follows:

Angola has a GDP of $89.6 billion, and a population of 29.7 million,

Benin has a GDP of 8.5 billion, and a population of 11.1 million,

Botswana has a GDP of $15.2 billion, and a population of 2.2 million,

Burkina Faso has a GDP of $12.1 billion, and a population of 19.1 million,

Burundi has a GDP of $3 billion, and a population of 10.8 million,

Cameroon has a GDP of $24.2 billion, and a population of 24 million,

Central African Republic has a GDP of $1.7 billion, and a population of 46 million,

Chad has a GDP of $9.6 billion, and a population of 14.8 million,

Democratic Republic of the Congo has a GDP of $34.9 billion, and a population of 81.3 million,

Djibouti has a GDP of $1.7 billion, and a population of 0.9 million,

Equatorial Guinea has a GDP of $10.1 billion, and a population of 1.2 million,

Eritrea has a GDP of $2.6 billion, and a population of 5 million,

Ethiopia has a GDP of $72.3 billion, and a population of 104.9 million,

Gabon has a GDP of $14.2 billion, and a population of 2 million,

Gambia has a GDP of $0.9 billion, and a population of 2.1 million,

Ghana has a GDP of $42.6 billion, and a population of 28.8 million,

Guinea Bissau has a GDP of $1.1 billion, and a population of 1.8 million,

Guinea has a GDP of $0.2 billion, and a population of 12.7 million,

Ivory Coast has a GDP of $36.1 billion, and a population of 24.2 million,

Kenya has a GDP of $70.5 billion, and a population of 49.6 million,

Lesotho has a GDP of $2.2 billion, and a population of 2.2 million,

Liberia has a GDP of $2.1 billion, and a population of 4.7 million,

Malawi has a GDP of $5.4 billion, and a population of 18.6 million,

Mali has a GDP of $14.0 billion, and a population of 18.5 million,

Mauritania has a GDP of $4.6 billion, and a population of 4.4 million,

Mozambique has a GDP of $11 billion, and a population of 29 million,

Namibia has a GDP of $10.2 billion, and a population of 2.5 million,

Niger has a GDP of $7.5 billion, and a population of 21.4 million,

Nigeria has a GDP of $405 billion, and a population of 191 million,

Republic of the Congo has a GDP of $7.8 billion, and a population of 5.2 million,

Rwanda has a GDP of $8.3 billion, and a population of 12.2 million,

Senegal has a GDP of $14.7 billion, and a population of 15.8 million,

Sierra Leone has a GDP of $3.6 billion, and a population of 7.5 million,

Somalia has a GDP of $6.2 billion, and a population of 2.1 million,

Sudan has a GDP of $95.5 billion, and a population of 40.5 million,

Swaziland has a GDP of $3.7 billion, and a population of 1.3 million,

Tanzania has a GDP of $47.4 billion, and a population of 57.1 million,

Togo has a GDP of $4.4 billion, and a population of 7.7 million,

Uganda has a GDP of $25.5 billion, and a population of 42.8 million,

Zambia has a GDP of $19.5 billion, and a population of 17 million, and

Zimbabwe has a GDP of $16.2 billion, and a population of 16.5 million.

Together, these 41 states have a combined GDP of $1165.9 billion, distributed among a population of 990 million.

These 41 sub-Saharan African states include oil-rich states such as Nigeria (which artificially boosts the GDP by over $405bn), but excludes South Africa, which still has a residual white-driven economy which has a GDP of $294bn—which is steadily declining (South Africa’s GDP was $416bn in 2011).

By contrast, the World Bank data shows that majority white Australia—only properly founded as a modern state in the 1850s—has a GDP of $1.205 trillion (a trillion has nine zeros) and a population 24,4 million.

At least 70 percent of the Australian mainland is classified as semi-arid, arid or desert; and for all practical purposes, uninhabitable.

It suffers from droughts and other environmental problems equal to, or worse, than most of Africa—yet its GDP far outstrips that of all of black Africa combined.

There is only one explanation for the disparity in achievement: race, IQ, and the ability of the population.

This reality is that all of sub-Saharan Africa has an average IQ in the range between 59 and 80—and that the average sub-Saharan IQ is around 62.

According to the internationally-accepted Stanford-Binet scale of intelligence, an IQ of 80 to 89 is regarded as “dull,” while an IQ between 70 and 79 is “borderline deficiency,” and an IQ between 50 and 69 is officially classified as “moron.”

Further evidence of this massive disparity is evident from other data drawn from the World Bank GDP figures and the UN’s population data:

The country of Austria has a GDP of $386 billion, and a population of 8.7 million,

Belgium has a GDP of $466 billion, and a population of 11.4 million,

The Czech Republic has a GDP of $192.9 billion, and a population of 10.6 million,

Denmark has a GDP of $306 billion, and a population of 5.7 million,

Estonia has a GDP of $23.1 billion, and a population of 1.3 million,

Iceland has a GDP of $20 billion, and a population of 335,000,

Finland has a GDP of $236 billion, and a population of 5.5 million,

Germany has a GDP of $3.4 trillion, and a population of 82 million,

Luxembourg has a GDP 59.9 billion, and a population of 583,000,

Hungary has a GDP of $124.3 billion, and a population of 9.7 million, and

Liechtenstein has a GDP of $6.6 billion, and a population of 37,000.

There is no “environmental” reason for Africa’s backwardness. It is unquestionably the most mineral rich, and agriculturally perfect, region on earth.

The African Leadership magazine, in August 2015, admitted that “when it comes to the stuff bling is made of, Africa is enormously bountiful. Its mineral deposits make it one of the richest natural-resource-laden places on Earth.”

According to that article, Botswana is home to 35 percent of Africa’s diamonds, and the Democratic Republic of Congo is estimated to have more than $24 trillion worth of untapped raw mineral ore deposits, and is one of the greatest producers of diamonds (34 percent) and copper (13 percent) in Africa.

However, as that magazine admitted, “the DRC continues to suffer from corruption and crime, and has been forced to shut down many mining operations to curb illegal activity.”

Tanzania, the article continues, “has impressive deposits of iron ore, nickel, copper, cobalt, silver, diamond, and more.”

Namibia has “46 percent of the continent’s uranium” which “helps bring in nearly a quarter of Namibia’s annual income,” while Mozambique produces 32 percent of Africa’s aluminium.

“Zambia is home to somewhere between 65 percent to 77 percent of Africa’s copper supply,” while Guinea “is responsible for more than 95 percent of Africa’s bauxite production, while Ghana accounts for the remainder” Bauxite is crucial for aluminum production.

Ghana is Africa’s second-largest producer of gold after South Africa, and holds more than 15 percent of the continent’s supply.

Compare all of this to the country of Japan, which has almost no minerals at all, but as a GDP of $4.9 trillion—and it becomes clear that race is the reason for the disparity, not “geography”, “environment,” or any of the other reasons race-denying liberals use to “explain” African backwardness.

Apart from decisively demonstrating the link between achievement and race, and destroying the “environment” argument for Africa’s backwardness, these statistics also prove the danger of allowing mass African immigration to Europe.

If the current mass invasion of Europe—disguised as “immigration” and “refugees” from Africa is allowed to continue, and indeed, is not reversed, then the statistics demonstrate that all of Europe will be dragged down to Third World status as the population becomes racially speaking, of Third World origin.

Source

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  


RELATED ARTICLES

Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.
Copyright © 2009 The European Union Times – Breaking News, Latest News. All rights reserved.