Home » Activism, Breaking News, Europe, European Pride, Immigration, Nationalism, Survival » EU Humiliated as 98% of Hungary Votes Against Immigration in Referendum


EU Humiliated as 98% of Hungary Votes Against Immigration in Referendum

 
 
 
 
 
submit to reddit

Hungarian Prime minister Viktor Orban has delivered a huge blow to the European Union after 98 percent of the Hungarian public soundly rejected EU migrant redistribution plans.

The Hungarian referendum on the redistribution of migrants and asylum seekers by the European Union has faced an almost unanimous result among Hungarian voters. An overwhelming majority of those who cast their ballot agree with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban that Hungary should not be forced by the European Union to accept migrants via redistribution.

The victory could set in motion the Orban government’s plans to create laws that may be even more stringent toward asylum seekers who enter the country and possibly those who are residing there today. Spokesman for Orban, Zoltan Kovacs, told press in Brussels last month that he expected the result to affirm the position of the government and be used as a stepping stone to create more laws.

However, the victory could be bittersweet for the Hungarian leader as voter apathy led to a low turnout. Many of the opposition parties have told their followers and supporters to either invalidate their ballots or simply not vote at all. Breitbart London spoke to several Hungarians on the streets of Budapest who were pro-Orban but also expressed concern that the rhetoric surrounding the referendum had gone on for a long time.

UPDATE!

Unfortunately only 43% of the electorate voted, short of the 50% required to be valid. However this is still a huge slap in the face of EU bureaucrats! Even if that missing 7% would turn out and vote in favor of immigration, the referendum would still end with AGAINST immigration votes winning in a landslide!

Orban is quite right to declare this a victory, if 95 – 98% of those who voted said “no to immigration”, it is not credible to claim that 100% of those who didn’t bother to vote supported “YES”! Would the 57% that did not vote all have voted “yes”? No chance and the EU knows that!

A government spokesman said the outcome was binding “politically and legally” but the opposition said the government did not have the support it needed.”

As a reminder, in 2003, also only 45% went to vote for the joining to the European Union. That time only 25% participation was needed for a referendum to be valid.

The EU are using every dirty trick up their sleeve to try and avoid acknowledging the fact that Hungarians have voted overwhelmingly against EU refugee policy.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 4.5/5 (4 votes cast)
EU Humiliated as 98% of Hungary Votes Against Immigration in Referendum, 4.5 out of 5 based on 4 ratings
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  



RELATED ARTICLES

Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.
  • Lone Ranger

    Hungary FTW.

  • Edward_Teach

    Why is it the responsibility of any European country to give these “refugees”(most are economic refugees) a better life? Europe has nothing to gain by letting or bringing these people in. Europe, your first and last obligation is to your people. What do the “refugees” have to offer? They bring nothing to the table. Europeans first in Europe, not last.

    Why don’t muslim “asylum seekers” go to Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates , Oman, Saudi Arabia or any of the other rich muslim countries? These are Islamic countries therefore more suitable for them.

    Has there ever been a European country that benefited by opening it’s borders to non-Europeans? If so, name it. Do they make Europe a safer place to live? Have they made Europe great? Are they good for tourism? Do they bring anything positive to Europe? Do they respect the citizens of Europe and the customs? Do they support themselves without burdening the tax payers? Do they burden the judicial system due to high crime rates? Do they love Europe or what they can get from her?

    Do they victimize the European people in large proportions to their small numbers? Wouldn’t crimes against the European people foreshadow their true intentions? Do they trash up the areas they inhabit in Europe? If they victimize the host country’s people and trash up their land after they have been given a new start at life, wouldn’t that be like a direct “screw you”? Do they demand you to change your ways and customs so they can tolerate you? Do they respect the peoples government? Your family? Your people? Your culture?

    If they are guilty of only three of these questions then It would be safe to say they should not be in Europe. There is more harm than good for Europe and her people.

    This day and time patriots are labeled as neo-Nazi, it’s a matter of time before the soldiers of today face Nuremberg type trials. If a European country don’t let the foreign hoards flood their land they are called “far right” “racist” “Nazis” and “xenophobic”. 

    If they let them in, their country, their lives, their descendants lives will be torn apart. Which one is easier to live with? Which one does the most damage? Which choice is beneficial to the European country and it’s people? Hint: A name will not destroy a country and it’s people. Europe, wake up and take stand before it’s too late and you lose everything.

Copyright © 2009 The European Union Times – Breaking News, Latest News. All rights reserved.