Home » Genocide, Immigration, North America » UN Admits Migrant Crisis Plan To Overthrow West

UN Admits Migrant Crisis Plan To Overthrow West

submit to reddit

Here’s how Goldman Sachs and the UN are using a wave of Islamic migrants to destroy the sovereignty of Western nations.

Thousands murdered by Islamists, priests beheaded, children run over while watching fireworks displays and the Jewish controlled media tells the public it’s not Islamic.

For more than 1000 years Europe has battled Islamic invasions, but in the 21 century Europe and the rest of the Western world faces a new type of war.

Powerful Jewish banks such as Goldman Sachs, the United Nations, the military industrial complex combining forces with Jihadist Islam to finally bring down Europe.

We are witnessing World War 3, it doesn’t look like past wars, its a stealth war conducted by traitors from within.

Every time you get to the bottom of who is funding disarming populations around the world, its Goldman Sachs. Every time you get to the bottom of who is opening up borders and destroying sovereignty, its Goldman Sachs. Every time you find out who is financing this anti-family, anti-fatherhood propaganda, its Goldman Sachs. followed by JP Morgan which is another powerful Jewish bank.

So its not any surprise that the head of the UN Migrant Program, who was the founder of the European Union, Peter Sutherland, who is a Crypto-Jew (a Jew who does not publicly admit his religion and ethnicity due to fear of criticism) and the chairman of Goldman Sachs, said that he wants to use 3rd world populations to undermine national homogeneity.

Peter Sutherland matches each and every single description of this video, probably except for his hair.

It doesn’t stop there with Goldman Sachs, they have been installing their former vice presidents and directors as presidents in places like Greece and Italy. Goldman Sachs is literately the devil, it is the scourge, the progenitor of all the crisis we face coming out of the NWO. But the anti-white racism garbage is only the cover, the elites want to destroy the liberties and the free market system that the West has promoted, that’s why it has allied with Radical Islam for a very long time.

Now you talk about racist towards Western culture and white people, this is the idea that because there are countries that are indigenous to white people, they must be undermined and they don’t argue that they should bring in Inuits, Brazilians or Asians, no, they argue that you bring in stone age people from Northern Africa and the Middle East which are totally incompatible with the West.

It doesn’t come as any surprise that the chairman of Goldman Sachs, Peter Sutherland who formerly ran the UN program on global governance took a demotion a few years ago to head up the United Nations migrant council. This is the weapon that he is using to “undermine national sovereignty and homogeneity”.

No votes yet.
Please wait...


Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

2 Responses to " UN Admits Migrant Crisis Plan To Overthrow West "

  1. Edward_Teach says:

    Why is it the responsibility of any European country to give these “refugees”(most are economic refugees) a better life? Europe has nothing to gain by letting or bringing these people in. Europe, your first and last obligation is to your people. What do the “refugees” have to offer? They bring nothing to the table. Europeans first in Europe, not last.

    Why don’t muslim “asylum seekers” go to Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates , Oman, Saudi Arabia or any of the other rich muslim countries? These are Islamic countries therefore more suitable for them.

    Has there ever been a European country that benefited by opening it’s borders to non-Europeans? If so, name it. Do they make Europe a safer place to live? Have they made Europe great? Are they good for tourism? Do they bring anything positive to Europe? Do they respect the citizens of Europe and the customs? Do they support themselves without burdening the tax payers? Do they burden the judicial system due to high crime rates? Do they want to replace your children with theirs? Do they love Europe or what they can get from her?

    Do they victimize the European people in large proportions to their small numbers? Wouldn’t crimes against the European people foreshadow their true intentions? Do they trash up the areas they inhabit in Europe? If they victimize the host country’s people and trash up their land after they have been given a new start at life, wouldn’t that be like a direct “screw you”? Do they demand you to change your ways and customs so they can tolerate you? Do they respect the peoples government? Your family? Your people? Your culture?

    If they are guilty of three of these questions then It would be safe to say they should not be in Europe. There is more harm than good for Europe and her people.

    If a country don’t let the non Europeans flood their land they are called “far right” “racist” “Nazis” and “xenophobic”. If they let them in, their country, their culture, their lives, their descendants lives will be torn apart. Which one is easier to live with? Which one does the most damage? Which choice is beneficial to the country and it’s people? Hint: Name calling will not destroy a country and it’s people. Europe, wake up and take a stand before it’s too late and you lose everything.



    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
  2. skreamer says:

    Well DER! We all knew this like 30 years ago!

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2009 The European Union Times – Breaking News, Latest News. All rights reserved.