Bernie Sanders fans are dumping the Vermont senator in mass after he endorsed Wall St.-backed Hillary Clinton on Tuesday.
“So disappointed. Bernie sold out millions and many of us fell for it,” one former fan tweeted. “Never again.”
And this tweet in particular revealed the great divide between populist Bernie voters and Hillary Clinton:
“Personally, I don’t think I will support Hillary. I don’t trust her,” Sanders fan Lisa Friddle told Fortune. “I can’t see backing someone I don’t believe in.”
Twitter was flooded with ex-Bernie backers with similar views:
And a large portion of Bernie followers will dump the Democratic Party altogether by either joining the almost non-existent Green Party or voting for Donald Trump in the general election.
As we’ve previously reported, a huge percentage of Bernie Sanders supporters would vote for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton in the general election.
Why would Bernie voters support Clinton, the establishment candidate who stole the election from Sanders with the help of big banks?
Simply put, there’s more to like about Trump than Clinton, many Bernie voters are finding out.
While noble – and populist – the Bernie movement was doomed from the start: it’s impossible to expand the state to fix inequality when the state, which produces nothing, is the creator of inequality.
“We have monopolistic state money, a central planner in monetary affairs (central banks), and banks that receive special privileges from the state,” economist Philipp Bagus of the Mises Institute pointed out. “…It is the state itself that causes increasing inequality, which it pretends to fight.”
So here’s some details about Bernie’s endorsement of Crooked Hillary
“I have come here to make it as clear as possible as to why I am endorsing Hillary Clinton,” Sanders said at an event in Portsmouth, New Hampshire.
“This campaign is not really about Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders. This campaign is about the needs of the American people and addressing the very serious crises that we face,” Sanders added. “And there is no doubt in my mind that as we head into November, Hillary Clinton is far and away the best candidate to do that.”
Sanders supporters now have a decision to make. Will they vote for Clinton in November?
It will prove difficult, if not impossible to reconcile Clinton’s deep Wall Street connections and Sanders’ “revolution.”
Sanders and Clinton, however, are not serious ideological rivals.
NBC News reports:
Never as ideologically pure as his stereotype suggests, Sanders backed Clinton’s health reform plan when he was a congressman in the 1990s, even though it fell far short of his favored single payer plan.
He appeared on stage with her at a event supporting the effort in Vermont. “Thanks for your commitment to real health care access for all Americans,” Clinton hand wrote underneath a photo of the two of them from 1993.
They overlapped in the Senate for only two years, but it was enough time to serve together on the Health Committee and team up some legislation, including successful green jobs training legislation dubbed The Sanders-Clinton amendment.
Clinton donated $10,000 to help Sanders get elected to the Senate, through a PAC. And he praised her as “one of the brightest people in Congress” when Obama chose her to be secretary of state.
The Washington Post mentions what has become a habitual knee-jerk reaction on the part of both Democrat and Republican voters.
“Bernie Sanders voters will support Hillary Clinton en masse—while holding their noses,” the newspaper headlined on July 8.
The Post cites a Pew poll revealing 85 percent of Sanders backers will support Clinton.
Others are not so sure. The results of a Bloomberg poll posted on June 22 shows 55 percent of Bernie supporters will not vote for Clinton.
“Conversations with two dozen Sanders supporters revealed a lingering distrust of Clinton as too establishment-friendly, hawkish or untrustworthy. As some Sanders fans see it, the primary was not a simple preference for purity over pragmatism, but a moral choice between an honest figure and someone whom they consider fundamentally corrupted by the ways of Washington. Sanders has fed these perceptions throughout his campaign, which is one reason he’s having a hard time coming around to an endorsement,” Bloomberg noted.
Now that Sanders has officially endorsed Clinton, the numbers will likely flip despite widespread dislike and mistrust of Clinton.
The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.
Quigley’s commentary is especially relevant in regard to intra-party politics.
Bernie Sanders should have never joined the Democrat party. It was a foregone conclusion the establishment would eat him alive and he would betray his loyal supporters.
- TIME Mag Names Donald Trump "Person of the Year" in Vicious Hit Piece
- Court Stops Michigan Recount, Turns Out the Lights on Hillary Election Steal
- ISIS declares WAR on Trump's inauguration day calling it 'Bloody Friday'
- Trump Up By 70,000 Votes in Wisconsin Recount So Far
- Obama Appointed Liberal Judge Orders Hand Recount in Michigan