Home » North America, Wars / Conflicts » British General Says A Nuclear War With Russia In 2017 Is “Entirely Plausible”

British General Says A Nuclear War With Russia In 2017 Is “Entirely Plausible”

submit to reddit

With tensions between Russia and the West at post-cold war highs, a former NATO deputy military chief is now saying that a nuclear war with Russia over the Baltic nations in 2017 is “entirely plausible” according to RT.

General Sir Richard Shirreff, from Britain, served at the second highest NATO military office in Europe between 2011 and 2014, has written a fictional book about a nuclear war with Russia in 2017 triggered by a dispute of the Baltic nations. While the story is indeed fictional, Shirreff said the story is based on an “entirely plausible” scenario.

The scenario in which Shirreff lays out is that Russia would first occupy Ukraine to secure a land route to Crimea and then invade the three Baltic nations, all of which are members of NATO. Shirreff claims Russia will do this because it feels that NATO is perceived as weak, and Russia will be oppositional about what it sees as the alliance’s attempt to encircle it.

“We need to judge President Putin by his deeds not his words. He has invaded Georgia, he has invaded the Crimea, he has invaded Ukraine. He has used force and got away with it” the retired General told BBC.

The general’s thesis is hard to disagree with of course. As NATO has recently moved 4,000 troops to Russia’s border, followed by the US turning on the missile defense system and immediately wargaming in Romania, the scene has already been set for such an occurrence. Russia has responded to NATO’s troop positioning by creating new military divisions of their own, and deploying them to the borders.

Even more to Shirreff’s point, as we noted a few days ago, Russia has already hinted at nuclear war in response to the US activation of the missile defense system in Romania. Last fall, as Russia grew concerned that the defense system would take away its first mover advantage of being able to strike in the event of a war, Russian security officials hinted that one miltary response would be to use a nuclear-armed drone submarine that would be detonated in coastal waters, causing a radioactive tsunami to flood and contaminate seaside cities. The purpose would be to “defeat important economic objects of an enemy in coastal zones, bringing guaranteed and unacceptable losses on the country’s territory by forming a wide area of radioactive contamination incompatible with conducting military, economic or any other activities there for a long period of time.” In fact, Russian commentator Konstantin Bogdanov wrote that the antimissile sites in Eastern Europe might even accelerate the slippery slope to nuclear war in a crisis.

All that’s left is a catalyst, something the US is apparently trying desperately to deliver as it continues to fly spy planes over Russia’s border, and encircles Russia with troops. If ever either side were to make one small mistake in how they choose to interact with each other, it could very well lead to nuclear war.


No votes yet.
Please wait...


Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

3 Responses to " British General Says A Nuclear War With Russia In 2017 Is “Entirely Plausible” "

  1. Lone Ranger says:

    Sorry Britain you had your chance to rule the World but you have fucked it up, nowdays you are only a muslim colony and the toyboys for the U.S.govt and military industrial complex, Even trolls like papa soros can collapse your financial economy, so forgive me if I dont give a fuck about your sissy predictions.

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
  2. Lone Ranger says:

    Aside from that he is full of shit, Russia attacked Georgia only after U.S. backed Georgia attacked South-Ossetia an ally of Russia and killed UN border patrol troops and started to genocide the local population that was the point when Russia went in and defeated the Georgians in 5 days, shortly after that they went home unlike the U.S. usually does.
    The story was even on CNN with a mother and her daughter whom told the Truth that they were saved by Russians and not Georgians when they said that live on air they stopped them to talk any further, the interview ended abruptly.

    Russia didnt invade Ukraine, they are at a civil war with U.S. backed ukrop nazis trying to genocide east ukraine where the locals are mainly ethnic Russians, the U.S. govt/cia tries to trigger Russia into a conflict, but they failed since miners and peasants with 40year old equipment managed to defeat their nazi army, most the regular Ukrainian army wont take part in that genocide only the cia paid nazi mercs.

    And finally Russia didnt invade Crimea either, they were legally stationed there since its the home for the Russian Black Sea Fleet, always was and always will be, the Russians only secured their people and assets in Crimea against a U.S. backed coup in Kiev, no civs were killed and there is peace there now contrary to east ukraine.
    Crimea was always part of Russia except between 1954-1991, they had three referendums since 1991 with every time voting for secession from Ukraine, they were ignored every time by the govt in Kiev, Crimea has a majority Russian population as well, Russia has every right to defend their people and assets against nazi/U.S. agression.

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
  3. Al says:

    General, please put down the crack pipe. You most be smoking crack. There is no validity to your story. In-fact it’s based on lies. It portrays Russia as the aggressor when in-fact it’s NATO pushing for war. So, shut the hell up!!

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2009 The European Union Times – Breaking News, Latest News. All rights reserved.