What if the United States lost a potential naval war to China, US analyst Harry J. Kazianis suggested, adding that there are certain grounds for such an alarmist stance.
According to Senior Fellow at the China Policy Institute Harry J. Kazianis, the United States’ capability of projecting power in the Asia-Pacific is waning.
“America now faces a very real threat to its ability to project power in the Asia-Pacific; and it’s a problem — considering how fast Beijing’s missile technology is progressing — that will likely only get worse as the years go by,” Kazianis wrote in his article for the National Interest.
Kazianis referred to the 2010 prognosis by James Kraska, a professor and research director in the Stockton Center for the Study of International Law, who pointed to the fact the US’ declining naval force was concentrated around ten aircraft carriers “spread thinly throughout the globe.” In contrast, China was bolstering its military capabilities in order to ensure its positions in the East China Sea.
In accordance with Kraska’s imaginary scenario, in the event of a US-China military standoff in the Asia-Pacific “US allies or partners… would have a hard time coming to Washington’s aid” and a US aircraft carrier would have a near zero chance of surviving a Chinese attack.
Furthermore, earlier this year members of the Air-Sea Battle Office and Joint Staff admitted that current doctrinal command-and-control methodologies will most likely fail to address modern anti-access/area-denial environments.
“The advancement and proliferation of disruptive technologies designed to counter power projection are undermining traditional US military advantages. The worldwide growth of anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) capabilities, the changing US overseas defense posture, and the emergence of space and cyberspace as contested war-fighting domains enable potential adversaries, both state and non-state, to counter qualitatively superior US and allied forces,” the military analysts stated.
“How should America respond to the growing anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) challenge presented by China, Iran and now Russia?” Kazianis asked.
According to Kazianis, America’s armed forces are aware of the problem and “working to ensure various types of anti-access technologies won’t limit or altogether negate American power-projection capabilities across all domains of possible conflict.”
The Pentagon’s new operation concept dubbed JAM-GC aims to deal with a wide range of challenges, including the capability to “effectively command and control Joint Forces in a heavily disrupted electromagnetic-spectrum environment”; “deter an adversary from proscribed action through demonstration of capability, presence and will”; “project power as needed to achieve objectives; and sustain and supply operations in the face of determined opposition.”
While the Pentagon is boosting the US’ Grand Military Strategy in Asia, the question remains open whether the US plans to use its military force to coerce Beijing into submission.
- LOL! Fake News Media Falsely Boost their Traffic with Chinese Bots
- Russia's secret shield: Perimeter, aka Dead Hand
- Trump Announces Harsh Vetting Measures on Muslims During Pentagon Speech
- China invents paper again, this time Resistant to Fire and Water
- Pentagon: F-35 Unfit For Combat With 276 Deficiencies and Counting