Home » Breaking News, Europe, Wars / Conflicts » Terrified US Aircraft Carrier Flees From Russian Subs To UK Safety


Terrified US Aircraft Carrier Flees From Russian Subs To UK Safety

 
 
 
 
 
submit to reddit

The Naval Surface Forces (NSF) of the Ministry of Defense (MoD) are reporting today that three nuclear-powered Akula-class submarines belonging to the 24th Submarine Division of the Northern Fleet (NF) successfully “war-gamed” the American aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt [photo 1st right] causing it to “flee in terror” towards the waters off the Hampshire coast in the United Kingdom.

Within hours of the NSF reporting this critical incident, it’s interesting to note, British press sources confirmed that this US Navy behemoth of “100,000 tons of firepower” did indeed dock off Stokes Bay in Gosport stunning the thousands of spectators who jammed roads and lined the banks of the River Solent to see it, but which they, also, described as a port call, though none had been scheduled.

According to this NSF report, the USS Theodore Roosevelt, and its combat escort ships, had been detected on a course towards the operating zone of the Northern Fleet which President Putin had put on full combat alert last week in response to a “State of War” threat detected from the United Kingdom…a threat, the MoD adds to this report, was, likewise, in response to the Federations “Shock of March” battle plan revealed on 4 February.

With NATO forces, literally, lining the entire western border with troops, including the unprecedented US Army’s “Dragon Ride” armored convoy currently winding its way across six European nations, and Norway’s equally unprecedented “Joint Viking” combat war moves against the northern border, this report continues, President Putin himself gave the order to “target and disable” the USS Theodore Roosevelt.

As Russia had warned its citizens last week to prepare for nuclear war, and Moscow’s bomb shelters began to fill in response to the dire first-strike nuclear attack being planned by the US, and nearly all of the Federations military forces being on full combat alert across all 9 time zones, this report further notes, the approach of the USS Theodore Roosevelt towards the Baltic Sea made it a “legitimate” target.

To how this US aircraft carrier was “disabled” by the Northern Fleet’s attack submarines, this report says, was due to the Federations successful implementation of “magrav technology” weapons which had previously been used against American warships, and had “disabled” them too.

In fact, NSF experts in this report state, it was only a few weeks ago that the USS Theodore Roosevelt was “sunk” by a French submarine using “magrav technology” off the coast of Florida during a war game wherein the Americans were testing their countermeasures against this revolutionary new weapon prior to their ships deployment to confront Northern Fleet forces.

The necessity of the US Navy to develop countermeasures against “magrav technology”, this report says, was clearly shown to them last year after Federation air forces completely disabled the feared AEGIS destroyer USS Donald Cook in the Black Sea. So demoralizing was this attack against the USS Donald Cook, when it limped into a Romanian port for repairs, all 27 of its officers put in for reassignment and/or retirement.

“Magrav technology”, its import to note, was conceived by the Iranian-born nuclear engineer Mehran Keshe [photo 2nd right], but whose works are banned from public use in the United States under an Executive Order signed by President Obama on 23 April 2012.

President Obama’s signing of his Executive Order against “magrav technology”, it should be remembered, was due to the Iranian’s using it to down, and then capture one of the United States most secretive and sophisticated drones in December, 2011, and then Iran sharing this new weapon with Syria too.

Immediately upon President Obama banning “magrav technology” in 2012, it should also be noted, Mehran Keshe replied to the American leader in an open letter by stating:

“Your Excellency President Obama,

We offer you a path towards real world peace through the development of this new technology for the whole human race

I invite you to a direct presentation of our technology to you and your cabinet, to be given on neutral ground where the president of Iran could also be present and where no one betrays anyone else, so that we can all understand the fundamental change that is about to be brought to mankind. Then let us talk about genuine world peace.

As I said in my Sunday interview in Los Angeles, let us convert the military factories of the US to provide resources for a US space organization, so that the tools of war become the craft of universal peace.

The aircraft carriers of the US will become nothing but floating bathtubs if our Magravs technology is used effectively, and the runways full of F16s and 18s and so on will be nothing but runway museums of iron birds, as these craft will not be able to fly if their electronic systems are once touched by Magravs space technology. These crafts and battleships would have to be rewired from A to Z before they could ever operate again.

President Obama, we invite you to understand this change and to let us show you the technology that is bringing it about. Then we invite you to the table of world peace.

Please sign a decree for genuine peace and not a gagging order for science and technology, which your people understand fully what we have developed as they try to protect the pride of your nation.

This is not a question of the pride of one group or country, but pride for all of us in the advancement of the human race to new levels of understanding of the universal order of creation, in which we each have our place.

Your Ambassador and Consul in Belgium have direct access to me from our previous talks and correspondence with them and would pass on any communication.

With kindest regards from a peace loving man who has developed this powerful technology for the good of mankind.”

Sadly, as this NSF concludes, it has cost the Obama the humiliating defeat of two of its most powerful warships since his banning of “magrav technology” in 2012, with the total disablement of the USS Donald Cook last year, the war game “sinking” of the USS Theodore Roosevelt a few weeks ago, and now, today, this same aircraft carrier floating disabled off the UK coast, to realize the truth of Mehran Keshe’s warning him that “the aircraft carriers of the US will become nothing but floating bathtubs”.

And though not stated in this report…one need look no further than it to come to a full and complete understanding of why Obama is furiously attempting to negotiate with Iran, while at the same time trying to keep his military forces from igniting World War III in order to destroy those nations who have begun using “magrav technology” weapons against them….like Russia and Iran…and (of course) the French submarine communications centre that’s already being targeted by US drones.

Source

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 3.7/5 (38 votes cast)
Terrified US Aircraft Carrier Flees From Russian Subs To UK Safety, 3.7 out of 5 based on 38 ratings
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  



RELATED ARTICLES

Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.
  • skreamer

    Obama would be laughing his head off if he read that letter!
    Im sure he wants to help mankind…………Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha…takes breath……..Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!
    Remember…..all these assholes work for the same illuminati!

    • skreamer

      Did you know that Aircraft carrier has 4 nuclear reactors in it!
      Another Fukushima waiting to happen if someone blows it up!!!
      How smart, putting nuclear reactors in boats which are used in war!
      If we were at war with giant insects on an alien planet…….then maybe put nuclear reactors in ships……….but not on our own planet you stupid phucking idiots!!!!!

      • Hanchey

        OH MY GOD I GOT A GOOD LAUGH THIS MORNING!! This whole artical is lies and you don’t have to worry about another Fukushima, trust me that’s not how it works. For your own peace at mind you should learn how ship reactors work.

        • skreamer

          OMG…you think they have some kind of magic nuclear reactor on the ships that work differently to nuclear reactors on land….you must be American…for sure!……are you phucking stupid or what!!!

      • Gareh B

        Skreamer, only one US navy aircraft carrier has ever been built with more than two nuclear reactors, USS Enterprise (CVN-65), and it was retired from use in 2012 . Every other nuclear powered aircraft carrier in the US navy has two reactors, not four.

        Secondly, before you start making claims about another potential Fukushima accident, perhaps you should educate yourself about WHY the Fukushima accident actually happened (hint: the sea water from the tsunami wave that came ashore at Fukushima damaged backup systems that could have prevented the reactor problems from happening). An aircraft carrier is a ship, it floats on top of the water, and if you watch some videos of the flooding as it actually happened in Japan from that tsunami wave, it wasn’t some kind of huge tidal wave like movies often show.

        Let’s face it, you’re an ignorant numptie who doesn’t have even have a vague clue about nuclear technology, you’ve just let yourself be convinced that “nuclear is bad” no matter what. Are there potential problems with nuclear power? Sure, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima have shown that, but when properly planned and managed, nuclear power isn’t “the end of the world as we know it” that you seem to think it is.

        Did you know there is a nuclear reactor at Lucas Heights in Sydney, owned and run by the Australian Govt?

        • skreamer

          Again with the magic nuclear reactors on warships that are somehow different to other nuclear reactors, sure…nuclear reactors are safe on ships, somehow you have built nuclear reactors that are magic safe! ….then why wouldnt they use these magic safe nuclear reactors in your land based ones as well?…your a genius just like your other American brainwashed friends! You believe whatever bullshit they tell you, like a good little dumbass!
          Have you ever seen what happens to warships during war?…….you cant be that naive!…..oh wait!….you are!
          Your statement…ships float on water is amazing proof of how stupid you are!…this makes a nuclear reactor safe how mr dumbass?
          and it is quite apparent that you have no idea about nuclear technology!

          PS:all future Aircraft carriers built by the USA well have 4 nuclear reactors….dickhead!
          And you need to educate yourself about what Fukushima has done to the pacific ocean you reject!
          Please prove me wrong by eating lots of seafood!

          • Gareh B

            First, I’m not American. See that little flag next to my name, it’s the same as the one next to your name. Can you guess what that means?

            Second, All currentl in-use and all currently planned US nuclear aircraft carriers have TWO reactors. Not four, TWO.

            From the US Navy’s official web site: http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=4200&tid=200&ct=4

            “Gerald R. Ford class
            The Gerald R. Ford class is the future aircraft carrier replacement class for Enterprise and Nimitz class aircraft carriers.”

            (this is the US Navy’s newest aircraft carrier design. As the older US carriers are retired from use, they will be replaced by new copies of the Gerald R Ford class carrier.)

            “General Characteristics, Gerald R. Ford class
            Builder: Huntington Ingalls Industries Newport News Shipbuilding, Newport News, Va.
            Propulsion: Two nuclear reactors, four shafts.”

            See that? TWO reactors, not four, TWO.

            And if that’s not enough for you, from the Wikipedia page for the same ship. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_R._Ford-class_aircraft_carrier#Power_generation

            “Two Bechtel A1B nuclear reactors will be installed on each Ford-class carrier,”

            Why does it say “two”?

            Here’s another web page:
            http://www.military.com/equipment/gerald-r.-ford-class-aircraft-carrier

            Propulsion Two nuclear reactors, four shafts.

            Oh look, there’s that “two” word again, not four, “two”. You really shouldn’t have so much trouble remembering it. It’s the number between one and three. For someone who is calling other people dumb, you really should learn about a concept you’ve obviously never heard of before, It’s called “getting your facts correct before you run your mouth off”,

            You’re still an ignorant numptie who doesn’t understand what you’re trying to talk about,

        • skreamer

          Gareh B..you need to stop drinking and learn how to read!..it says like your American friends stupid…yes i can see the flag dopey!
          Still pulling your chain over something allready explained!
          Still crying over 2 vs 4 nuclear reactors…like i said…all future aircraft carriers built by the USA well have 4 reactors ….dickhead!
          please read correctly what has been written and go suck up to your American overlords as much as you want, you piss weak little wanker!
          Only brain dead wanna bees believe US military propaganda then actually try to spread it!
          How dumb are you to send Wikipedia links to try to prove how stupid you are!
          Keep your American propaganda to yourself dopey! ..are you fuckin 10 years old or what?
          You cant read!..your argument is irrelevant and you keep bringing up obsolete comments like…..”Did you know there is a nuclear reactor at Lucas Heights in Sydney, owned and run by the Australian Govt?”……..Which has what to do with American Aircraft carriers having 4 nuclear reactors….dickface!
          Your so stupid or a troll working for the Australian military!
          Either way i shall not answer anymore of your dumbass stupid retarded “i cant read ingrish comments”
          Please eat more seafood!

          • Gareh B

            “Still crying over 2 vs 4 nuclear reactors…like i said…all future aircraft carriers built by the USA well have 4 reactors ….dickhead!”

            Right, right, and you can show some information to support that claim, or is everyone just supposed to accept it just because you said it? Show some evidence for the claim.

            Maybe you’ve been swallowing someone’s propaganda yourself, but no, that couldn’t possibly be true. After all, you know everything about everything and you’re never wrong, are you?

            As for working for the Australian military, nope, never have, and at my age I never will. I also don’t have any relatives or friends who have any connection to the military either. More wild accusations from you, with no proof to support them. There’s a pattern of claims with no evidence to support them in all your comments, but you can’t see it, can you?

            I’m not the person who needs to use coarse language, you are. I’m not the person making claims that have no evidence to back them up, you are. I’m not the one behaving like a 10 year old child, you are.

            Ignorant numptie is still ignorant.

          • Chuck

            WOW! The butthurt really floweth from screamer doesn’t it? LOL

      • Bigkahunna456

        Ok. What would you use as a powerplant for an aircraft carrier?

  • Defiant

    Dont poke the bear guys:), its not a defensless third world country you usually like to steamroll, you have been warned.

    • Taking care of business!

      I’m not in the lease pleased with our (USA) intervention in the” third-world” or being used/played by the Illuminati (along with other nations) in creating the New World Order (NWO). Nor do I favor the intervention of any nation into the affairs of another nation. Sovereignty should be respected. That said, this article is a farce, an invention of a press desirous to embarrass. Naval battle-groups, no matter the nation, enjoy complete shielding from assault, above, on, or beneath the surface. They do NOT go cruising, prone to submarine or other attack. Understand, shadowing submarines are NOT invincible nor amenable to countermeasures. For anyone who believes the fleet ran, you are being played the fool.

      • Defiant

        I agree with the first part of your comment on the other hand the second part is not totally up to date it would have been true in the 70’s but its 2015.
        Contrary to popular belief Russian subs are the most advanced nowdays like the Akula II\III classes or the new Yasen attack subs, not to mention their new Borei class SSBN, Pentagon dont calls them black hole subs for nothing.
        There is no protection against supercavitating torpedos and supersonic cruise missiles wich are deployed on most Russian subs along with “regular” weaponery.
        I dont know about this new tech but I know that Russia has mastered EMP weapons tech a long time ago they have a lot more experience with it than the US., the USS. Donald Cook also had a similar incident on the Black Sea about a year ago but than it was buzzed by a Su-24 wich was equipped with their newest electronic warfare system onboard.
        All that sad its good to know that there are still patriotic americans in the US., good luck to you and your fellow patriots I hope you will be able to take back your country from the globalists and their puppet politicians and minions, I really do, it would be in the interest of us all.

    • Dan

      Oh you mean like Russia is doing to the Ukraine… idiot

      • Defiant

        You spelled US. backed ukie nazis wrong.

    • Johnny Salami

      U.S.Navy will never run from anyone, especially the Russians, Bitch!

    • Johnny Salami

      You are in a dream world if you think the U.S. Navy will run from Russia.

  • don’t you all just love all the pop ups on this website? I won’t be coming back

    • Freddy Kruger

      “All the pop ups”? I don’t know about you but I’m only getting ONE every once in a while. I think its every 24 hours or something. Now if 1 pop up per day is too much for you, I don’t know what type of websites you usually browse but most of the sites I go to, they open a new pop up on every page I go without any time limiters. =))

  • Darren

    You print utter rubbish. Teddy Roosevelt was a planned visit to Portsmouth UK. I knew about it 2 weeks ago. USA aint scared of putin or anyone. It is you putin that would run form the big stick!

  • Yours Truly

    Total BS that only a scared faux noise groupie would believe…

  • Steven

    =)) You’ve got to be kidding! I will wager that not one sailor on the Roosevelt was terrified of anything. The Akula is a forty-year old design. The Roosevelt’s escorts probably heard them before they heard the Roosevelt. What is probably not being reported are the Virginia class subs that had the Akula’s in their sights the whole time without being detected. I wouldn’t be surprised if a RN Astute class joined with the Virginia’s in the fun.

    • Defiant

      More like thirty, thats only true for the Akula I, but there is the Akula II and III classes and the first gen ones are being retrofitted constantly making them state of the art, Russians subs are the most advanced and most stealthy nowdays, Pentagon dont calls them “black hole” subs for no reason.
      And they also have now their newest Yasen class the most advanced attack sub every built.
      And what does the US. have? 50 year old Los Angeles class, 3 boats of the SeaWolf class, and the Vriginia class wich is basically a cost effective “light” version of the Seawolf, its a good little sub but lets be honest its no match for an Akula, neither in speed nor depth or reactor output.
      Stealth capebilities: a Virginia class sub was caught and escorted out of the Barrents Sea a few months ago by the Russian navy, no big deal, while Akulas could cruise for weeks in the Gulf of Mexico and on the East Coast without detection, so much to that. All public info by the way, google is your friend:)
      I wont even mention the weaponery, most Russian subs are equipped with supercavitating torpedos and supersonic cruise missiles wich there is no protection against them, the US. lacks that type of weaponery in their inventory.

      • Yes

        Does no one talk to Filipinos anymore? they coulda told you where the ship was going to be weeks ago… all this talk about advanced technologies and no one bothers to talk to any Filipinos about where the ship is going.

        also… the ship left late from the states because its “super advanced technology” got effed up by some “super primitive” sealife dicking up its seawater intake…

        so its just now getting to europe… please, seriously talk to some Filipinos.

  • Sam

    Hahaha, this makes me laugh. Having lived aboard the USS Dwight D Eisenhower for over a year in combat zones, I have to say there wasn’t a day that I feared for my life, and there wasn’t a night that I didn’t sleep soundly.

    • Defiant

      Dumbness and confidence go hand in hand.

      • Chuck

        Actually wisdom and confidence go hand in hand. “dumbness” lol.

        • Defiant

          Nah, lay off the kool-aid.

        • Defiant

          A wise man knows that he knows nothing, only the dumb are confident.

    • LACLASS

      Nor was there a night I didn’t sleep soundly while aboard a fast attack submarine, trailing a pathetic Akula across the Atlantic and across the Med for a month. We could hear what they were having for breakfast. This website’s a buncha bullshit.

      • Defiant

        You have wached too many JAG episodes.
        The Pentagon calls them black hole subs for a reason they could easily cruise on the east coast and in the Gulf of Mexico for weeks without detection meanwhile a Virginia class sub got caught on the Barrents Sea and was escorted out by the Russian navy, no big deal:)
        Currenty Russian subs are the most advanced live with it like the Akula II and III, the new Yasen or their SSBN Borei class.
        They have better weaponery, are more silent, have higher reactor output, better max and operating depth, better maneuverability the list goes on.
        Look up how french and swedish subs could took out whole carrier battle groups without breaking a sweat at mock combats like the stirling powered Gotland class and those are toys comapred to the Russian subs, its wakey wakey time not everyting is true you are getting told more precisly lied to.

  • Jay C

    This story is completely fabricated. The picture is from a while back.

    Why would you post this rubbish?!

  • Johnny Salami

    No Carrier puts to sea alone, there are at least 20 other surface ships and subs near by. No way would the Navy be intimidated by a few Russian antiques.

    • Defiant

      Its wakey wakey time, if the main systems of a carrier are useless or damaged it will leave and its escort will follow simple as that.
      Antiques are your moms silver in the kitchen.

  • wff,world freedom fighter

    This post is interesting,why would a us super hightech naval warrior ship go to where it can’t dock?
    On the same note why is the us waiting to go head on with Russian alliance (Russia,Syria, Iran,China,…?)maybe just maybe the us has fear of what the most famous whistleblower might have told them and with proof not to speak of the rest of the country’s that will back Russia in a war event,or is that so far fetched that you american puppies don’t see.
    America’s government and a great deal of Americans feel they can poke they’re fingers wherever it suits them but the world is proving them wrong.
    We the people will know the truth but by then it’s just too late and while we are trying to survive the cataclysm of a thermonuclear war between the most powerful nations on earth the ones pulling the strings will be tucked away in they’re already made and stocked bomb shelters around the hole globe.
    There’s only one way to avoid all this and it’s very simple in fact,STOP USING MONEY BECAUSE MONEY IS WHAT KEEPS THEM GOING.
    It will be hard at first but only a complete global boycott to the owners of this sistem will end with it,many many people will die but look to the news inocents are already being killed by the thousands everyda.
    I could go on and on but I choose to stop here and let you open your eyes
    Don’t believe in what your being told as the supreme truth, investigate, learn with what happened in the past and you alone will figure it out real easy….
    To all the Americans who think us armed forces don’t run away I suggest check Yemen recent events they runned away In less than a Week!!!!

    P.S. Flight 4u!!! Obvious?
    9525
    9 = September?
    5 = am/pm?
    25 = day?

    Hope I’m wrong
    I really do.

    Best of luck for all of mankind
    We’ll need it.

    WFF

    • Chuck

      It’s very common for aircraft carriers to park off shore for port calls. I’ve done it dozens of times. This port call was planned nine months ago which makes this story a complete fabrication.

  • Sandcrab

    Um, the USS Theodore Roosevelt was inport Norfolk, VA at the time stated in this article. If you’re going to do anti-US propaganda, at least you could get your facts straight.

  • wff,world freedom fighter

    No propaganda here,
    just my point of view.

    Thanks for enlightened me.

  • apnymphguy

    all you pro US military guys talking about how we wouldn’t ever run from the Russians are you basing these statements on our past performances? The us hasn’t won a military conflict since ww2 & the Russians won’t be shooting 60yr old armaments at our boys I wish them good luck guys your going to need it.

    • Slenth

      Dude, what rock have you been under? We have won a few wars since WW2.

    • Slenth

      Dude, what rock have you been under? We have won a few wars since WW2. =))

  • Chuck

    All you folks buying into this story are just a bunch of nerds that need to step away from your computers and get outside more. Why the fuck would a US ship (or entire battle group for that matter) “run” from a Russian one if we are not in any hostilities? Every run in I’ve had with Russian Navy over the last 23 years has been nothing but professional. In one instance we’ve even hosted each others personnel on out respective ships. This carriers port visit has been planned months in advance and is a very common port of call for the USN. Calling this story out as bullshit isn’t being “pro-US military”, it’s just calling it what it is which is bullshit. US or Russian Navies aren’t “running” from anybody. You folks watch too much TV and need to quit reading the retarded internet tabloids.

  • Russian BS The US warship is currently on a five-day visit to Portsmouth

  • myitchyballs

    =)) you would have to be practically retarded to believe this nonsense. I guess the writers of this propaganda actually think that the people that read this are the dumbest people in the world.

  • skreamer

    Abetter story would be………US carrier forced to England under mind control of invading Aliens while Admiral defects to Russia for disobeying Obama’s orders to launch nuclear strike at Moscow!
    Furious, Obama forces wife to take more female hormones!!…or was it male hormones……i forget!
    But one things for sure!….your all going to die!

  • wtf

    Well if the Russians chased us to a 5 day port call to Portsmouth then thank you, the boat was getting irritating an the break was amazing.

    • Chuck

      Now only if the Russians would invade so I could get a four day weekend.

  • skreamer

    This is very true!…I saw Putin myself on a row boat chasing the Aircraft carrier with a broom!
    Everyone on the Aircraft carrier was screaming and crying they were so scared!
    All the sailors hid on the lower decks crying and slipping over in their own tears and feces, screaming for their mummy’s.
    It took 3 days to clear all the sailors out cause they wouldn’t let go of the ship!…so scared!
    The reason the Americans are so scared is cause they have never seen this……”a white straight leader with balls!”…..there used to black Muslim homosexuals from Kenya with a drag queen wife…
    We in Australia wish to UN-alliance from the USA cause we don’t follow Kenya, Muslims or drag queens! Please remove your garbage from our country PLEASE! …especially your BASES and MEDIA…as it is for the massively retarded!!!
    WW2 and Vietnam is over…please remove your bases, you seem a little slow with that!!!
    or soon we well treat you like everyone else in the world does…….BADLY!

    • Sup

      Are you mad because everytime we pull into an Australian port your wife is the first one to take us in? Trust me she does this while you are at the bar getting drunk with your mates on Foster beers or better yet Emu beers. Last time I was there we had a 2 day welcome party and we sure loved the beer and all the Australian wifes…..

      • Chuck

        What makes this comment the best is it’s the truest words spoken on her so far!

      • Chuck

        What makes this comment the best is it’s the truest words spoken on here so far!

      • skreamer

        Your just like the American president……unfortunately drag queens and whores dont count, i dont drink nor am i married.
        Like most Americans…every single word that comes out of your mouth is wrong!
        We are upset that dumb asses like you destroy the world for money, and your comments show exactly why your in the military….”not too smart are you!”
        Here’s a classic comment for you…….”i joined the military cause im a genius!”
        Hahahahahahahahaha…yes im laughing at you and your free dental care!

        • Sup

          Well, it looks like there’s only one drongo, banana bender, vegemite eating idiot that loves the so call news posted on this website. Get a life and go get yourself some shrimp on the barbie you poofter!! Oh that wasn’t your wife we banged? Then it must has been your mother because she sounded like you, you whinning dingo fucker.

        • Sup

          Well, it looks like there’s only one drongo, banana bender, vegemite eating idiot that loves the so call news posted on this website. Get a life and go get yourself some shrimp on the barbie you poofter!! Oh that wasn’t your wife we banged? Then it must has been your mother because she sounded like you, you whinning dingo fucker.

          • skreamer

            You seem very angry…is it because your ashamed of your gay leader with his drag queen husband?, Dont blame me son, i didnt bang your mother and make you!..You cant blame me for your small brain development!!
            Hey stupid, i notice you keep going on about some sex you had in Australia with your mates…….its like you never had sex anywhere else! How much do drag queen prostitutes cost in Australia? Do you normally have sex with your boyfriends around?…..Do they get in bed with you? You have sex with your mates…then you call me the poofter!
            I see…hmmmm…lets go back to my original comment……..”i joined the military cause im a genius!”
            Hahahahahahahahaha………..…yes im laughing at you!
            Please keep your AIDS in America and not spread it around the world oh fagot lord of gayness!

          • skreamer

            PS: When i grow up mummy i want to be on a ship with thousands of men, stuck out on the lonely sea, we can all dress up, we can all play bed bunks at night on the lonely sea, we can all hold each other tight, on the lonely sea, we can all swallow, cant you see, that’s why they call us semen out here on the big blue sea!
            “coughs”…….fagot!
            Did you warn the drag queen prostitute that you have AIDS?

        • Chuck

          ~Skreamer~

          “your comments show exactly why your in the military….”not too smart are you!”

          “Here’s a classic comment for you…….”i joined the military cause im a genius!”
          Hahahahahahahahaha…yes im laughing at you and your free dental care!”

          “you’re” not “your” and “I’m” not “im”.

          Please check your punctuation too. L-)

          You’re welcome! =))

          • Skreamer

            Only fags worry about spelling chuck!

          • Chuck

            Your mother didn’t think I was gay when I was in her port. Funny how the women from your country drop their so called men in a flash and wait for us at the pier. What a great time. Pussy everywhere and not a man in sight.

          • Skreamer

            There called whores chuck!…even a dumb American like you should know that!….or are you extra stupid? …and chuck …if you banged my mum…it proves what a desperate desperate boy you are! She is the ugliest hag on earth..fat and stupid like you and about 80 years old! No wonder your into transvestite prostitutes….cause there a lot like my mum!
            Is your last name norris?

  • jay

    you people are dumb. im in the navy and stationed on the roosevelt. it was a scheduled port call and had been a month before deployment began. this is funny tho

  • Texas

    Jesus does everyone believe what they read on the internet? I’m not going to argue with anyone on here, all I’m going to say is check the Facebook page for the USS Theodore Roosevelt. Magrav tech, what a crock of shit.

  • got a good laugh

    =))
    You guys better watch out for those “meteors”

  • Leopold

    You miss the whole point, the Keshe technology is the main aspect here. And all facts regarding it are true.
    The ban of USA regarding this is suspicious for many, that plasma tech is amazing.

    And those who doesn’t want it are those who control the world (not another conspiracy theory!) and that tech which is FREE can break the chain of command but can open completely new horizons.

    As Tesla had to suffer and many other genius guys, Keshe is a smart ass for sure and Iran is powerful indeed.

  • Tess

    what I do know is we have and are training thousands of Russian and Chinese in the States, why?

  • kinik

    забавно здесь американцев опускают! :)) :-q
    а вот про маграв-технологии впервые слышу, что-то новое

    и да, у нас в России нет единого мнения – что-же всё-таки произошло в Чёрном море с Дональдом куком

  • Todd B

    This article and many comments are just too dang funny.. I DID serve in the U.S. Navy and am American. And I can only laugh at those of you that believe this bull.. If carriers were that vulnerable, why would we build them? Second, WE do not RUN from anything or anyone… think so? Give it a try for real and let’s see who comes out on top.

    • Defiant

      Carriers are only good to steamroll third world countries, thats why most major powers only build 1-2 of them they dont need them except the U.S…, stealth subs and fast guided missile cruisers are the future.
      You did run from Vietnam and Iraq though.

    • Scruffy Scirocco

      I have a friend who was a ping jockey on a 688 Los Angeles class sub. In wargames with a US carrier, the carrier was outclassed by the sub, and couldn’t find it. Finally in frustration the task group commander asked the sub to launch a flare to help them home in. The flare landed on the carrier’s flight deck. Those behemoths are VERY vulnerable to subs.

Copyright © 2009 The European Union Times – Breaking News, Latest News. All rights reserved.