We recently came across a highly revealing report published on the 29th of January by the Daily Mail online.
In it Louise Boyle, writes of a U.S. “backed plan to launch a chemical weapon attack in Syria and blame it on Bashar al-Assad’s regime”, months before the actual attack happened.
Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.
The report contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme ‘approved by Washington’ is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.
Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.
According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email was sent from Britam’s Business Development Director David Goulding to company founder Philip Doughty.
Britam has admitted that it was hacked but denied that the emails released by the hacker were genuine. Click here for a statement by a Britam spokesman.
The original article has since been removed from the Daily Mail website but fortunately it has been archived by the famous Wayback Machine Internet Archive and it’s still available.
In response to their article the Daily Mail was later sued by Britam Defense, forced to publish a retraction and to pay “libel damages” of more than £100,000. This was later reported by the Guardian on June 26th.
One of the original leaks which led to this brief, but buried story, was contained in the Britam Leaks, which detailed the alleged plan to be carried out which was said to have received a green light from Washington and was to be financed by Qatar.
The US and the UK have been caught trying to stage a false flag on Syria’s president Bashar al-Assad in order to provide a pretext to the American people for attacking Syria.
Back in 2003 when the US attacked Iraq, most Americans were manipulated into believing that Iraq possessed WMDs (specifically chemical weapons) and the majority supported Bush’s lobby for war on Iraq.
However after a decade a war in Iraq, no WMDs have ever been discovered there because Iraq never possessed such weapons and Americans were lied to.
Now the US needs another pretext to go to war in Syria like they did in Iraq but this time Russia won’t allow it because unlike Iraq, Syria is a Russian trade/business partner. Iran has also warned the US against a war on its Syrian ally.
- ‘Moderate’ Rebels Eye Closer al-Qaeda Ties Over Fears of Abandonment by Trump
- Clinton scheming to seize White House through backdoor
- Kremlin asks Erdogan to clarify ‘anti-Assad’ goals in Syria
- Erdogan: Turkish forces are in Syria to end Assad's rule
- Even Obama Slams Stein: "Results Accurately Reflect The Will Of America"