A stunning proposal from the Federation Council (FC), the upper house of the Federal Assembly of Russia, to President Putin that is circulating in the Kremlin today calls for the present government of the United States, under President Barak Obama, to be labeled as a “criminal regime” due to its failure to adhere to the rule of international law, while at the same time it continues to embark upon numerous “paths of conflict” Russian lawmakers warn could ignite a catastrophic global war.
Fueling this extraordinary action by the FC, this proposal emphasizes, is the so called Magnitsky Bill signed into law by Obama on 14 December meant to punish Russian officials that were thought to be responsible for the death of Russian attorney and auditor Sergei Magnitsky by prohibiting their entrance to the United States and use of their banking system.
Even though the Russian foreign ministry labeled this new US law a “performance in the theater of the absurd,” and Putin said about it that, “This is very bad. This, of course, poisons our relationship” with the United States,” this FC proposal notes that the top law enforcement officer in America responsible for enacting it is currently under criminal charges which the Obama regime refuses to prosecute him for.
Oleg Ivanov, a top professor at the Diplomatic Academy, Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, further warned that the Magnitsky Act would send US-Russian relations into dangerous territory, all such warnings, however, being ignored by the Obama regime.
To the FC statement in this proposal that US Attorney General Eric Holder, who is currently holding his position as America’s top lawman, while at the same time he is charged with both criminal civil offenses, is, indeed, true, and as confirmed by the BreitBart TV news service in their 17 January article titled “Holder Begs Court to Stop Document Release on Fast and Furious” which, in part, says:
“As the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform was voting Holder into contempt of Congress for his refusal to cooperate with congressional investigators by failing to turn over tens of thousands of pages of Fast and Furious documents, Obama asserted the executive privilege over them. The full House of Representatives soon after voted on a bipartisan basis to hold Holder in contempt.
There were two parts of the contempt resolution. Holder was, and still is, in both civil and criminal contempt of Congress. The criminal resolution was forwarded to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Ronald Machen–who works for Holder–for prosecution. Despite being technically required by law to bring forth criminal charges against Holder, under orders from Holder’s Department of Justice Machen chose to ignore the resolution.”
Even worse about Holder, this FC proposal says, was his refusal, for the first time in US history, to prosecute criminals for breaking the law out of fears of “collateral consequences” which, in essence, says that the Obama regime will no longer go after their criminal banksters because they are “too big to prosecute”.
This astounding ruling by Holder, this FC proposal says, which was designed to protect the banksters that put the Obama regime in power in the first place, and was called “a dark day for the rule of law” by the New York Times News Service, is being kept from the American people by their mainstream propaganda media over fears of what these peoples full reaction would be to the staggering amount of money that has been stolen from them.
To the full amount of the Obama regimes crimes against its own people, this FC proposal continues, was fully detailed this past October by the Spire Law Group, who in their lawsuit on behalf of the American people stated that these “Banksters” control their $43 trillion racketeering scheme – known as the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States history, and identified $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money by these “Banksters” and their US racketeering partners and joint venturers and pinpointed the identities of the key racketeering partners of these “Banksters” located in the highest offices of government and acting for their own self-interests.
This unprecedented lawsuit further states: “It is now beyond dispute that, while the Obama Administration was publicly encouraging loan modifications for home owners by “Banksters”, it was privately ratifying the formation of these shell companies in violation of the United States Patriot Act, and State and Federal law. The case further alleges that through these obscure foreign companies, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo Bank, Citibank, Citigroup, One West Bank, and numerous other federally chartered banks stole trillions of dollars of home owners’ and taxpayers’ money during the last decade and then laundered it through offshore companies.”
Aside from the Obama regimes wholesale theft of their citizen’s money, this FC proposal further warns that with the US continuing its assault upon nearly the entire world with its military forces, and with Mexico being named yesterday as the latest country where American Special Forces troops are to be deployed, the corresponding rise of tensions from peoples around the world being continually killed by these outrageous US acts could very well erupt into World War III.
To if this FC proposal will be enacted into law thus ushering in a new age of East-West tensions it is not known. What is known, though, is that any regime like Obama’s that is bold enough to not only steal their own citizens money, and then refuse to put in jail those responsible for it, and then seeks to disarm all whom oppose them…one can surely see that the greatness of what America once was will never be again.
Russia Prepares To Label Obama Government “Criminal Regime”,
Loading ...
on 
on 
on 
on 
They are criminals. God save us.
Why God? It is not his business that we are not able to handle criminals! They are weed of society and we have to remove them. All people that believe in god: please, do not use his name in vain, it is a sin
Hasn’t the US government been a criminal enterprise long before Obama?
The criminality is now openly visible to all who care to see because Obama and his co-conspirators do not feel threatened by law enforcement agencies.
Where to start? Pick any decade. The creation of the privately-owned federal reserve and illegal delegation of the legislative duty to regulate our currency; the unconstitutional unapportioned income tax; Roosevelt’s illegal gold confiscation violating the 5th Amendment and due process; the unjustified, illegal invasion of Iraq; the unjustified, illegal bombing of Libya; the violent overthrow of governments in the Middle East, South America, Eastern Europe; the CIA’s attempted or actual assassinations of dozens of world leaders and private citizens including President Diem of South Vietnam; the illegal ObamaCare which forces the public to engage in interstate commerce against their will; the gun grab in violation of the 2nd Amendment;
the illegal shipment of hand grenades, machine guns, and assault rifles to drug cartels in Mexico and street gangs in L.A.; drone murders of hundreds of innocent Pakistani citizens; government corruption of American national news media and so much more.
The obvious question: what took Russia so long to realize what is happening in America? And where are the other nations who haven’t yet spoken about this?
How many more people have to be killed by US officials before someone says, “Enough!” and demands Obama and friends be sent to the International Criminal Tribunal for trial?
Who says US officials immunity from prosecution in the international courts? Remember, the defeated Nazi government never recognized or accepted the jurisdiction of the Allies at Nuremburg, so lack of official recognition is no excuse.
Will any nation’s sovereignty last 3 more years if Obama continues sending soldiers and war materiel to every nation on earth? I doubt that.
The premise is wrong causing the statement that the US government is criminal to be false. If the government were a citizen living in a society with rules they would certainly be guilty of criminal acts, charged and imprisoned. But they are not a citizen living by a set of rules. Of course the UN has rules, but in addition to a free pass, veto given to five powers, the US has financial leverage as no one else wants to pay for a bloated bureaucracy. Also not being a citizen a government usually has a consensus of their public, so a replacement head of government would likely rule exactly the same way.
I’m not condoning the mountain of despicable acts the member’s of the UN Security Council do regularly. Just saying nations play by different rules and need to be shamed in different ways then a normal citizen.
Paul: why are you trying to see things in such a complicated way? They are not citizens?? They are just the same as we are. We are paying them so they are obliged to materialize our will. Otherwise it is a crime a we have to punish them! That is what we should talk about and nothing else. No different rules then a normal citizen. Just the same!!
Jopn is correct. In America and Canada, elected officials are citizens engaged in public employment, and their sovereign immunity is limited by statute and applies only to reasonable acts that are within their authority and scope of employment. They may be prosecuted for crimes exactly the same as any citizen.
If they commit murder, the instrument of death does not exonerate them from criminal liability.
Criminal liability exists regardless of whether they murder innocent people using a knife, a gun, or a drone. The only exceptions are a declared war or after a proper trial. Congress has yet to declare war against any other nation or group of people.
The current wars in which the US is participating are entirely illegal despite Congressional funding, because the Congress has failed to officially debate the subject in order to formally declare war.
No formal war declaration exists for any of these war expenditures, and that eliminates the “war exception”.
The US constitution requires a war declaration, not a war ratification by funding. Congress was never given any constitutional power to delegate its duty to declare war.