Home » Breaking News, Injustice, North America, Suppression » Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns

Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns

submit to reddit

The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been identified by observers as a flagrant threat to the second amendment and which Barack Obama is determined to sign has its roots in a 1961 State Department memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee “complete disarmament” of the American people under the ruse of preventing war.

The UN Arms Treaty has caused so much controversy because it outlines a plan to target “all types of conventional weapons, notably including small arms and light weapons,” according to Forbes’ Larry Bell.

Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”

A letter sent last month by 130 Republican House members to President Obama argued that the treaty should be rejected because it infringes on the “fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms”. The letter adds that “…the U.N.’s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights.”

Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents and “international crime syndicates,” the UN is busy trying to imply that all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a global scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority.

This is precisely the same language used in a 1961 U.S. State Department briefing which outlined a long term agenda to carry out a “Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.”

Invoking the threat of nuclear warfare, the document spells out a plan to create a “United Nations Peace Force” that would “enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.”

While the document initially focuses on scrapping nuclear weapons, it later makes it clear that the only groups allowed to own weapons of any kind would be governing authorities, “for the purpose of maintaining internal order,” and the UN “peacekeeping” force itself, which would require “agreed manpower.”

“The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes,” states the document.

While the memorandum outlines a broader mandate to destroy national sovereignty, eviscerate national armies and institute the UN as the planet’s supreme authority with a world army, the document serves as a stark reminder that the plan for the United Nations to oversee the abolition of the second amendment has been in the works for decades.

As Bell points out in his Forbes article, the threat of the Obama administration relying on a UN treaty to do what successive administrations have tried but failed to accomplish – taking a huge bite out of the second amendment – is by no means far fetched.

After all, a plethora of UN treaties and international agreements have already stripped the United States of its sovereignty and its power to decide its own laws. The power to authorize U.S. involvement in wars and conflicts has now been almost completely stripped from Congress and handed to the United Nations.

Following Barack Obama’s arrogant rebuff of Congress in seeking approval to strike Libya, during which he churlishly remarked, “I don’t even have to get to the Constitutional question,” Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta affirmed that the U.S. now requires “international permission” before deciding on its military policy.

Other Obama-endorsed UN power grabs like the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) as well as Agenda 21 and sustainable development are also serving to decimate national sovereignty and remain almost completely under the radar.

You only need to look at the European Union, which now crafts around 50 per cent of the laws made in member states like Britain, to understand how unelected global institutions can and have dictated policy on a national level.

The UN Arms Trade Treaty presents an existential threat to the guns rights of American citizens and should be rejected for what it is – yet another attempt by the Obama administration, in the aftermath of the Fast and Furious scandal, to abolish the second amendment by stealth.

Also a newly leaked US Army Military Police training manual for “Civil Disturbance Operations” outlines how military assets are to be used domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.


VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 4.6/5 (16 votes cast)
Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns, 4.6 out of 5 based on 16 ratings


Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

32 Responses to " Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns "

  1. James says:

    The way I see it; everyone has to die. I WILL die one day.

    It is a sad commentary on a Saxon’s life to die peacefully in his bed.

    If I am to go out; fighting for the rights my forefathers fought so hard to obtain and maintain, then I want to take out as many of the bad guys as I possibly can.

    Death is just a thing.

    I’d rather be in the place with my forefathers anyway.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +29 (from 29 votes)
    • Scott says:

      Hoo(r/y)ah James. The UN and all govermnment is just an organization of people. At any time, we can boycott, reject, ignore these organizations and they are powerless. They get away with what we let them get away with. I will see you on the front lines, AND on the other side. Holla if you hear me!

      PS, take OUR guns to prevent war… when did WE, the people, ever WANT to go to war? When we’ve been tricked, or attacked.

      PPS VVV Huldah said it right. Any bill that is unconstitutional is null and void. Doesn’t mean they won’t try, but we have the RIGHT and are EXPECTED to fight for right, and those who can not!

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +6 (from 8 votes)
    • WeisseTodt says:

      With all of the World’s Warriors assembled, maybe one of them will give me a glorius death.


      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +1 (from 3 votes)
    • Corey says:


      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +3 (from 5 votes)
  2. Huldah1776 says:

    The SCOTUS just reaffirmed the 2nd ammendment, therefore signing this agreement is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and will not stand. Obama must fall along with it.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +12 (from 14 votes)
  3. 6sp says:

    If you live by the sword, you die by the sword.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -2 (from 6 votes)
  4. James says:


    And that certainly applies to all concerned; then bad guys as well.

    And there is nothing ignoble about dying by the sword if the cause is just.

    Those afraid of death are already dead inside.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +3 (from 7 votes)
  5. Geof says:

    I was a US Marine. We talked about this quite a bit. No way in hell we would ever obey an unlawful order like that. Guess what. I bet other infantry units felt the same. If it ever came to that…. the US govt would fall because the USMC would defend the citizens of the united states with its entire arsenal. As a citizen no longer serving in the Corps. I rest easy knowing my brothers have the watch against all enemies…Foreign and domestic.

    Im sure the majority of the ARMY feels the same.

    This is a non issue.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +35 (from 35 votes)
    • Scott says:

      You’re not the first, and you certainly won’t be the last. Your civilization cannot thank you enough for your stead-fast support.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +14 (from 14 votes)
    • KathieAmericanCitizen says:

      My grandson is National Guard, and his entire platoon, (what ever they are called) have all taken the OathKeepers pledge. The only military I worry about are the illegals who are trying to get citizenship, and the Muslims already in the military. DEFUND THE UNITED NATIONS, KICK THEM OUT OF THE USA, AND BRING OUR TROOPS HOME NOW.
      Also, the Sheriff of your country should be an Oathkeepers too and has authority over the feds.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +14 (from 16 votes)
      • jon says:

        This is really naive statement, Kathie. EVERYBODY joins military for money! It does not matter if it is American or foreigner! It is a job. And do not forget very important thing: A soldier must obey orders, if not, they can be killed. You should also keep in your mind that most of military guys are on drugs and they do not care what they are doing to other people.

        VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
    • Rob Dell says:

      Obooboo thinks he is Xerxes reincarnate. Nothing but a two bit shoeshine boy who will import massive ranks of foreign UN troops with a burning desire to rape, pillage and murder. When Obooboo let’s them loose on us, we should give no quarter as none will be given to us. When Obooboo gives his order, the meelee should not stop until every hall of every capitol runs knee deep in their gore. We trusted these people. We paid these people to represent us. The untimate betrayal of Americans should precipitate the ultimate purge.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +5 (from 5 votes)
    • John says:

      :-bd Semper Fi!

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
      • John says:

        BTW – Once a Marine ALWAYS a Marine – no “was’s” or “formers”.

        VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
  6. Peter says:

    Turning in guns? I don’t think so. Self defense is our natural right!


    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +10 (from 12 votes)
  7. TEXAS TRUTHER says:


    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +8 (from 10 votes)
  8. ryan says:

    Molon labe

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
  9. jackie watson says:

    geof i got your back brother, u.s.army :-D

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +6 (from 10 votes)
  10. Alfred F. Jones says:

    Let them come and try to take my gun I have a gun He has a gun let’s write a tragedy together. :evil: :twisted:

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +9 (from 11 votes)
  11. geriann says:

    It will be UN soldiers who come not ours.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 6 votes)
  12. Tom says:

    8) Then it won’t be American troops that we kill and disarm.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +3 (from 5 votes)
  13. Azrael says:

    I love the fact that he fails to mention the document in question is actually a drafted proposal to end the Cold War. It has nothing to do with the Arms Trade Treaty. The Arms Trade Treaty is clearly outlined to go after the ILLEGAL and ILLICIT procuring of weapons, namely to shut down BLACK MARKET WEAPON TRADING to TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS. Furthermore it will not hinder, IN ANY WAY, any nation’s citizens ability to legally own firearms.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +3 (from 5 votes)
  14. Mike says:

    I can kill just as quick with a knife. They may want to take those to. I just have to be closer that’s all. :-)

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  15. Jas says:

    Remove the (Foreign Agent) from the Peoples Whitehouse…YES, Destroy our US Constitution, I Don’t Think SO! Take our GUN’s, come and TRY… Foreign Troops sanctioned by a Foreign body on US Soil, to begin Raiding and Terrorizing Our American Families…

    AS a Proud Member Who Served & Defend This Country Well… Your ASS is MINE to the END. We Will Show YOu What It Means To Have FREEDOM RING!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
  16. Captn says:

    Please review the United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Bond v United States June 16, 2011. This unanimous decision specifically forbids the US federal government from enforcing treaty against the individual. This decision also extends the powers granted to the State in the US Constitution to the individual. My personal favorite part is where the federal government is limited to only those powers granted in the US Constitution. This unanimous decision has both a majority opinion and an unusual minority opinion, not generally not generally present in an unanimous decision. I believe it applies to your topic. I am sure you will find most interesting regardless.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
    • Zharkov says:

      The Bond decision recognizes that private individuals have standing to assert a state’s rights cause of action against the federal government regardless of whether that state is a party to the lawsuit if the individual is actually harmed from federal violation of that state’s rights.

      What this case does is provide a green light to individuals enforcing their civil rights against federal oppression if their state fails to protect them.

      One example is federal abuse of the Commerce Clause to regulate purely intrastate commerce, rather than commerce between states as it was originally intended.

      Federal gun regulation where the guns never leave the state of manufacture could not materially affect interstate commerce and should not be subject to federal regulation of any kind.

      Any affected state could challenge federal abuse by citing the 10th Amendment in court action, but they seldom bother, so any affected citizen would now have standing to sue and assert violation of state’s rights when his personal rights have been compromised by federal action.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  17. Manu Costa says:



    If we are rendered powerless, what else can we do to confront the tyrants?


    “And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”.
    ― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn

    “In keeping silent about evil, in burying it so deep within us that no sign of it appears on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousand fold in the future. When we neither punish nor reproach evildoers, we are not simply protecting their trivial old age, we are thereby ripping the foundations of justice from beneath new generations.”.
    ― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago 1918-1956.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  18. koz says:

    Ive also talked to alot of guys in my unit and we have a Plan of action incase something like this goes down. senior leaders are going to be REALLY mad when half the unit is AWOL. 82nd abn division US ARMY

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  19. Mamakenn says:

    I have been an Oathkeeper for 40 years,and if they want my guns they had better bring their own body bags.Itake no prisoners.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  20. Zharkov says:

    Psyops will always be used on the military to convince them to follow orders.

    For example, during the Watts Riots, the commanding general of the California National Guard told the troops that the leaders and instigators of the riots were communists.

    Troops were given the impression that the riots were sponsored by Soviet agents, and that made it a little easier to see black Americans as the enemy.

    Whether any of that was true or not, most soldiers went along with the program believing what they were told. There is always a cover story to try to justify an otherwise outrageously illegal use of power.

    What soldiers need to remember is that they signed up to repel foreign invaders, not their fellow Americans.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2009 The European Union Times – Breaking News, Latest News. All rights reserved.