Home » Culture, Europe, Falsehood, Immorality, Social » Europe to destroy traditional family and sexual identity


Europe to destroy traditional family and sexual identity

 
 
 
 
 
submit to reddit

Traditional words ‘father’ and ‘mother’ will be replaced with official terms Parent 1 and Parent 2 in Britain reported the BBC and the Daily Mail. The terms will be used in official documents. The authorities decided to make such a “politically correct” move to accommodate same-sex couples. Experts are sure, though, that the matter is not about the requirements of certain social groups. The decision is another step towards the destruction of traditional families.

The words ‘father’ and ‘mother’ will be removed from British passport applications before December 2011. This became an achievement of Stonewall group, which defends the rights of sex minorities. The US State Department tried to do the same before, but it was eventually decided not to remove the two words from US passport applications.

The subject about novelties in the field of gender relations has been getting more and more popular recently. Not so long ago, Pravda.Ru wrote about the kindergarten in Sweden, which became world-famous after its administration decided to simply abolish the use of ‘he’ and ‘she’ pronouns.

Last year, the European Parliament published the brochure, which recommended not to use the words ‘Missus’ and ‘Miss’, ‘Mademoiselle’, ‘Seniora’ and ‘Seniorita’. From the point of view of the European parliament, the use of such words was discriminating against women because they directly indicated their sexual identity.

One does not have to be an expert to realize that such novelties in various countries are not just a coincidence. It is a trend, the goal of which is to change the public perception of the role of the sexes in the society.

Pavel Parfentyev, the chairman of the inter-regional public organization “For Family Rights” also shares this point of view.

“Indeed, this is a serious international trend. It started back in the seventies and the eighties as a powerful movement to defend the rights of sexual minorities. There were organizations that tried to defend even the rights of pedophiles, who, as they believed, also had the rights for their own sexual preferences.

“The organizations publicly said that their goal was to destroy family. Afterwards, under the pressure of public opinion, many activists decided to refuse from the openly sexual bias in their activities. They proceeded towards the protection of human rights. This is how they approach children’s rights today. They think that children must be protected from the despotism of their parents – from any forms of traditional upbringing, that is to say. In order to accomplish that, one has to destroy the traditional family first and to make the family become a form that enslaves and binds children,” the expert said.

In order to be more efficient, representatives of such movements began to cooperate with large international organizations such as the UN and the Council of Europe. This led to the creation of a small, albeit a very strong lobby for the protection of the rights of sexual minorities on the international level, Pavel Parfentyev believes. The lobby intends to distort the perception of traditional family in the modern society.

As a result, European officials already try to avoid the use of the word ‘family’ in top-level international documents. Instead, they use “family in all of its forms” expression, which implies all forms of cohabitation. As a matter of fact, they deliberately erode and expand the notion of family. The family as we know it has virtually disappeared from the new term.

“The lobby prefers to move in small steps. At first they say that one should not discriminate human beings on their gender rights and sexual orientation. It is hard to argue with this indeed. In Russia, there is no discrimination of real human rights on the base of sexual preferences. At the same time, they create special, previously unseen “rights” and preferences for homosexuals on the international level. As a result, they attach special importance to sexual orientation, which distinguishes a person and makes them stand higher than others,” Pavel Parfentyev said.

The words indicating the sexual identity of people gradually disappear from official speech and documents. If they abolish ‘he’, ‘she’, ‘father’ and ‘mother’ they will not be able to abolish the gender per se. However, it can be possible to undermine the traditional perception of gender.

“A family is much more than a marital union of two people. It is a reproduction mechanism for the whole society. The movements for the protection of rights of sexual minorities are trying to undermine the traditional or natural family, as we call it. They want to take it beyond the scope of public values. More importantly, they want to separate the process of procreation and childcare from marriage and family. According to them, children and parents are two different things that must exist separately from each other. They cast doubts on the special role of parents in raising children,” the expert added.

Many people in Britain claimed that the above-mentioned novelties undermine family grounds in the country.

Source

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 2.7/5 (20 votes cast)
Europe to destroy traditional family and sexual identity, 2.7 out of 5 based on 20 ratings
  • 941
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 14
  •  
  •  


RELATED ARTICLES

Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.
  • Juancho

    Isn’t “father and father” or “mother and mother” much easier? jeeze… this fucking world is fucking nuts

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +24 (from 26 votes)
  • Ferrarello

    It was Adam and Eve…NOT Adam and Steve. :-D

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +3 (from 43 votes)
  • Robbie

    Another “Sign of the Times” !

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +6 (from 14 votes)
  • Leviticus 20:13

    If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 26 votes)
    • JaM

      Jesus didn’t say that though, or are you worshipping false idols?

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: -1 (from 15 votes)
      • Rob

        Hi Jam, WHAT exactly did Jesus NOT say?
        Be a bit more precise in your comments please.
        Rob

        VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: -3 (from 9 votes)
        • Magpie

          The only bit in the bible about homosexuality (the above quote from Leviticus) is from the old testament. Christ never said anything one way or the other about it. Jesus came to create a new covenant, which gave one new rule to follow–love thy neighbor as thyself. This overrides all the laws in the old testament.

          VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
          Rating: +2 (from 12 votes)
          • Tiberius

            THANK YOU

            VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
            Rating: 0 (from 4 votes)
          • Jewel

            From the New Testament:

            Romans 1:26-32

            “For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.
            28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality,wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, 30 backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving,unmerciful; 32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.”

            VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
            Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
    • Chris

      Oh is it time to play the game “only quote bible verses I agree with.” Or do you take every quote in there literally. I suppose you also strongly agree with this one?

      1 Timothy 2:11-12

      A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +7 (from 11 votes)
  • Man of Reason I think

    I think this is good. For legal questions in a state that recognizes same sex marriage it makes total sense. I find it funny when people whip out a bronze age book and quote from it as if it were relevant now. Indefensibly laughable at this point. BUt otherwise, good on the UK for making strides in every updating the definition of what it is to be a human being. I am not your definition or your religions definition, I am what I am and frankly, “person 1” is probably as accurate a description as a stranger could have.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -17 (from 29 votes)
  • dcvb

    Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter. – Isaiah 5:20

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +3 (from 17 votes)
  • whitewitch

    so sad these people are dysfunctional

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -2 (from 8 votes)
  • FUMO

    It is a sign of the times. Glad I have no children. This earth is going to hell in a hand basket.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +8 (from 18 votes)
  • G

    they cant say father and father, mother and mother cuz that ish dont even sound right.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -5 (from 7 votes)
  • That’s just great, now the freaking Daleks can have kids too. Will my anus be reclassified as a reproductive organ?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +4 (from 14 votes)
  • Darren Sharrocks

    All this to defend a minority that is only 1.5% of the uk population. I say this more than defending the the rights of minorities but soical engineering. As for rights of parents they are getting weaker by the day, mothers have had their kids taken off them becaue they canot fill forms. Fathers have no rights whatsoever in uk familes courts. Despite what the human rights act says,. This is another nail in the coffin. Just you waint when it dawns on people that they have no right to a family life . Ie one man and one women and kids, thats when there will be a big backlash

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +3 (from 9 votes)
  • Lesley

    I can’t believe that some people would think this is a good idea. Hitler set out to dehumanise people by giving them numbers instead of names. Dehumanisation is defined as making someone less than human by taking away what they are. That kind of treatment usually happens in a dictatorship.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 6 votes)
  • My Wife and I are joint Parent #1 to our children. Why do the EU want to rank us differently?

    Are the EU going to make burkas compulsory for all, so we don’t accidentally discriminate on gender in face to face meetings?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +5 (from 7 votes)
  • Chloe Adams

    Paul Perrin – totally agree with you. A numbering system diminishes equality the other way. Who determines who is #1 and #2?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +6 (from 6 votes)
  • Ferrarello

    Thank God for women. :-D

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 4 votes)
  • zen

    I was raised by my grandmother. It is not just a gay issue. Sometimes parents die and are adopted by other members of their family for example. Let’s not just try to bully the gay people here and open our minds to all the different dynamics of the family structure.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -1 (from 9 votes)
    • Zen – doesn’t that just totally highlight the problem here?

      Your grandmother brought you up – did she demand that forms, laws and language were changed?

      The norm is to have a female mother and a male father – why should that norm, the majority be bullied into changing what *they* do and have done for generations?

      We can have mother, father, guardian, parent 1 and parent 2 if you like – don’t take father/mother, husband/wife away from us…

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +6 (from 8 votes)
  • zen

    Paul, I do agree more variables are useful in this situation. The tone of the comments here however seemed to direct the blame of this decision towards same sex couples. All families are unique and we should all learn to respect & accept that. If you are a mother/father they can never take that away from you.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -1 (from 7 votes)
  • Adrian

    I don’t agree that the change “undermine[s] the traditional or natural family”. But I also think it is ridiculous. If a same sex couple can’t figure out who is mom and who is dad, try in a heterosexual couple to figure out who is parent1 and who is parent2! Or in the same sex couple too, for that matter.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -2 (from 2 votes)
  • wilder125

    Gay couples to be confused by this move.

    They won’t be able to figure out who the man is (lesbian)or woman is (gay men)in the relationship anymore.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -2 (from 4 votes)
  • Tuana

    I have to say, most of these comments make me really sad. It seems many of you read the bible but miss the point entirely.

    I hardly see how this tinny change on a piece of paper is going to effect any straight couples and their rights.

    Pick your battles, people. If you don’t like something, then don’t have any part of it.
    Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
    In accordance to the bible, it is not our place to judge, it’s god’s. Leave judgment to the professional and life your lives free of hate.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -1 (from 3 votes)
  • Meridia

    I’m more concerned with the “removing sexual identity” thing and not using gender specific pronouns. I am female. I am offended that you would rather refer to me as “it” than “she” because “she” is what I am, and you can change the stereotypes and traditions over time. You cannot change the fact that I am biologically female.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +5 (from 7 votes)
    • Aidirem

      I couldn’t agree more. It’s the same thing that is happening with racial political correctness. Now were supposed to call people of African descent he and she instead of the traditional ble and sble. Doing so isn’t going to change the fact that they are biologically black.

      As for myself, I believe every person should be proud of his/her/blis/bler own gender and heritage.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
  • Rob Leather

    Not sure what’s worse. The stupidity of not offering simple options for the boxes… or how upset people are about it.

    Have we genuinely not got better things to worry about than this.?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +2 (from 4 votes)
    • wilder125

      This is the internet. Behold the power of typing on a keyboard due to being bored.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
    • Language influences the way we think – what could be more important than that?

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
      • Adores

        I was under the impression that the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis had been largely discredited, but I’m not a professional linguist.

        Obvious source bias is obvious.

        VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Terry Smith

    Why is there no choice on the form to enter either father/mother or parent 1/2?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
    • Sue Denim

      Exactly. Just the other day I was filling out paperwork at the veterinarian, and the form had a line for “Name of Pet”. I have a cat, but there was no “Name of Cat” line. I know some people have dogs, but why couldn’t they have a “Name of Pet” and a “Name of Cat” line?

      In my opinion it’s all a conspiracy by the small minority of iguana owners to destroy traditional cat/owner roles and values.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
      • DK

        This is one of the best comments I’ve ever read!

        VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mtbwalt

    Technically a maximum of one of the homosexual partners can be the biological parent, anyway. Call that one mother or father.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • matrix

    this is WHY Rothchild IS YOUR BOSS! All come from BOSS

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  • Jack Longchamps

    I am an atheist and not all that traditional,
    I can see the logic in the argument,
    all good and well…
    but still, these people are definitely crazy.

    Human culture (not technology) has obviously reached
    it´s highest heights in Roman times,
    now it is over-reaching.

    A good, killer-app world wide decimating catastrophe
    would serve us well,
    and I guess it is now only a matter of time ;)

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Copyright © 2009 The European Union Times – Breaking News, Latest News. All rights reserved.