Home » Financial Crisis, North America » Real U.S. unemployment rate may be 22.1 percent for February

Real U.S. unemployment rate may be 22.1 percent for February

Yikes! You won’t believe the real jobless numbers. Federal docs contradict 8.9% hyped by media.

The real U.S. unemployment rate may be 22.1 percent for February, not the 8.9 percent reported by the government, according to economist John Williams, author of the “Shadow Government Statistics” website, who has argued for years that the federal government manipulates the reporting of economic data for political purposes.

The government announced today the unemployment rate was reported to have fallen 0.1 percent to 8.9 percent in February, although that is the “seasonally adjusted number.”

According to Bureau of Labor Statistics Table A15, the “not seasonally adjusted” unemployment number for February was 9.5 percent.

Find solutions for yourself, in “Killing Wealth Freeing Wealth: How to Save America s Economy & Your Own.”

Separately, Gallup disagreed with the BLS, reporting earlier this week that unemployment had risen to 10 percent in mid-February, as seen in the following chart:

But Williams recreates an SGS (Shadow Government Statistics) alternative unemployment rate reflecting methodology that includes “long-term discouraged workers” that the Bureau of Labor Statistics in 1994 under the Clinton administration redefined away from those considered “unemployed.”

The BLS no longer considers as “unemployed” those workers without jobs who had not looked for work in the past year because they felt no jobs were available.

Williams demonstrated that it takes an expert to truly decipher BLS unemployment statistics.

For instance, in a Table A-15, titled “Alternative measures of labor underutilization,” the BLS reports what is known as “U6 unemployment.”

U6 unemployment includes those marginally attached to the labor force and the “underemployed,” such as those who have accepted part-time jobs when they are really looking for full-time employment.

While the BLS was reporting unemployment in February 2011 was only 8.9 percent, the BLS also was reporting U6 unemployment in February 2011 at 16.7 percent.

The only measure BLS reports to the public as the official monthly unemployment rate is the seasonally adjusted U3 number.

Williams calculates his “Official SGS Alternative Unemployment Rate” by adding back in the BLS U6 numbers that include those long-term discouraged workers who have not looked for work in the past year.

Williams insists his Official SGS Alternative Unemployment measure is the most accurate estimate of true unemployment in that a reliable measure of long-term discouraged workers should be included in the statistical analysis.

A more complete unemployment table that includes both seasonally adjusted and not seasonally adjusted unemployment percentages for U3 unemployment, as well as the same for U6 unemployment, followed by the John Williams Official SGS Alternative Unemployment rate:

Increasingly, critics like Williams feel the seasonally adjusted U3 numbers reported by the BLS as the official monthly unemployment rate do not give a reliable picture of the true magnitude of unemployment in the United States.

The monthly unemployment rate report turned out by the BLS defines unemployment as those currently without a job who have actively looked for work in the prior 4 weeks, and are currently available for work.

This definition excludes from the definition of unemployed those who have grown so discouraged that they are only marginally looking for work, as well as those who are considered underemployed because they have been forced to accept part-time or lower paying full-time employment because no other jobs are available.

To get an estimate of these other categories of unemployed, we have to turn not to the BLS monthly unemployment rate press releases, but to a less well-known table produced by the BLS, Table A-15, “Alternative measures of labor utilization.”

The relevant A-15 BLS table for February 2011:

This reveals unemployment for February 2011 not at 8.9 percent, but as 9.5 percent, comparing the seasonally adjusted U3, the unemployment percentage the BLS reports to the public, with the not seasonally adjusted U3, the unemployment percentage the BLS reports only in detailed tables such as this one.

Looking at the not seasonally adjusted U6 data, the unemployment rate jumps to 16.7 percent for February 2011, not the 8.9 percent seasonally adjusted unemployment rate reported in the monthly BLS unemployment rate press release.

Economist Jim Fitzgibbon, the head of the Highlander Fund, calls the BLS monthly unemployment rate report “worthless,” noting “the entire report is seasonally adjusted to be positive, while the non-adjusted data is just awful.”

So, where the seasonally adjusted U3 unemployment rate dropped from 9.4 percent in December 2010 to 8.9 in February 2011, the non-adjusted U3 unemployment rate is moving in the opposite direction, from 9.1 percent in December 2010 to 9.5 percent in February 2011.


VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
Real U.S. unemployment rate may be 22.1 percent for February, 5.0 out of 5 based on 2 ratings

Related Posts

Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.
  • http://PacificNWHousingSolutions Francis Bart Bertholic Jr

    More people need to realize this as being much more accurate than the government’s numbers

  • Rey

    Even if people realised this being true or not, they are so polarized with their party and will agree with the government. These figures don’t even include undocumented, children who aren’t working yet, and elderlies and retirees. I wonder what percent of the population is actually not working?

  • Eric

    So, what was the Depression era numbers like? Did they reflect this new math, or is our government adjusting the numbers to “look good”?

    • Bill

      Eric, in the great depression (thanks to a 95% tax rate on corporations by FDR and dems), the unemployment rose to about 42% when calc about the same as U6, unadjusted basis.

  • http://www.3blenders.com Thomas

    you need to consider that we are fed the wrong numbers on purpose. It is all a hype propaganda so we the people won’t really know how serious it really is. We can’t just count those that receive unemployment payment. Many people are under-employed. More are even job-less and have not looked for a job for a while because it is hopeless…or nearly hopeless. I, for one, earned $4,000 a month and now am at $1500. Oh, well, how lucky of me, I am not unemployed. Take me off the governments stupid unemployment list.

  • Trish

    I totally agree with you Tom, We the People need to educate, educate, educate ourselves, be prepared for what is happening.
    The unemployment during The Great Depression was 25%. Very scary!!!!!!!. It has been 80 years since The Great Depression, 2 generations. It is coming around again. The causes for The Great Depression are the same ones we battle today.

Copyright © 2009 The European Union Times – Breaking News, Latest News. All rights reserved.