Home » Breaking News, Middle East, Wars / Conflicts » Germans pull forces out of NATO as Libyan coalition falls apart


Germans pull forces out of NATO as Libyan coalition falls apart

 
 
 
 
 
submit to reddit

Unsure: Libyan rebels retreat from the outskirts of the city of Ajdabiya, south of Benghazi. Nato members are also fighting over who will take command of allied forces.

* Tensions with Britain as Gates rebukes UK government over suggestion Gaddafi could be assassinated
* French propose a new political ‘committee’ to oversee operations
* Germany pulls equipment out of NATO coalition over disagreement over campaign’s direction
* Italians accuse French of backing NATO in exchange for oil contracts
* No-fly zone called into question after first wave of strikes ‘neutralises’ Libyan military machine
* U.K. ministers say war could last ’30 years’
* Italy to ‘take back control’ of bases used by allies unless NATO leadership put in charge of the mission
* Russians tell U.S. to stop bombing in order to protect civilians – calls bombing a ‘crusade’

Deep divisions between allied forces currently bombing Libya worsened today as the German military announced it was pulling forces out of NATO over continued disagreement on who will lead the campaign.

A German military spokesman said it was recalling two frigates and AWACS surveillance plane crews from the Mediterranean, after fears they would be drawn into the conflict if NATO takes over control from the U.S.

The infighting comes as a heated meeting of NATO ambassadors yesterday failed to resolve whether the 28-nation alliance should run the operation to enforce a U.N.-mandated no-fly zone, diplomats said.

Yesterday a war of words erupted between the U.S. and Britain after the U.K. government claimed Muammar Gaddafi is a legitimate target for assassination.

U.K. government officials said killing the Libyan leader would be legal if it prevented civilian deaths as laid out in a U.N. resolution.

Strikel: Gaddafi's forces have taken a pounding from allied air offensives. The news comes as Italy has warned it may withdraw use of its military bases if no NATO agreement is reached.

But U.S. defence secretary Robert Gates hit back at the suggestion, saying it would be ‘unwise’ to target the Libyan leader adding cryptically that the bombing campaign should stick to the ‘U.N. mandate’.

President Barack Obama, seeking to avoid getting bogged down in a war in another Muslim country, said on Monday Washington would cede control of operations against Muammar Gaddafi’s forces within days, handing the reins over to NATO.

But Germany and European allies remain unwilling to have NATO take on a military operation that theoretically has nothing to do with the defence of Europe.

Today the German defence ministry announced Berlin had pulled out of any military operations in the Mediterranean.

A ministry spokesman said two frigates and two other ships with a crew of 550 would be reverted to German command.

Some 60 to 70 German troops participating in NATO-operated AWACS surveillance operations in the Mediterranean would also be withdrawn, according to the ministry.

Berlin isn’t participating in the operation to impose a no-fly zone in Libya and abstained on the U.N. resolution authorising it.

France, which launched the initial air strikes on Libya on Saturday, has argued against giving the U.S.-led NATO political control over an operation in an Arab country, while Turkey has called for limits to any alliance involvement.

In a bid to halt the embarrassing bickering, French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe today proposed a new war committee to oversee operations.

The new body, Mr Juppe said, would bring together foreign ministers of participating states – such as Britain, France and the U.S. – as well as the Arab League.

Meanwhile the head of the Italian Senate’s defence affairs committee, Gianpiero Cantoni, said the original French anti-NATO stance was motivated by a desire to secure oil contracts with a future Libyan government.

Some allies are even questioning whether a no-fly zone is still necessary, given the damage already done by air strikes to Gaddafi’s military capabilities.

Speaking about yesterday’s hastily arranged meeting of NATO allies, one diplomat said: ‘The meeting became a little bit emotional,’ before adding that France had argued that the coalition led by Britain, the United States and France should retain political control of the mission, with NATO providing operational support, including command-and-control capabilities.

‘Others are saying NATO should have command or no role at all and that it doesn’t make sense for NATO to play a subsidiary role,’ the diplomat added.

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu suggested that air strikes launched after a meeting in Paris hosted by France on Saturday had gone beyond what had been sanctioned by a U.N. Security Council resolution.

‘There are U.N. decisions and these decisions clearly have a defined framework. A NATO operation which goes outside this framework cannot be legitimised,’ he told news channel CNN Turk.

Adding pressure to the already fractured alliance, Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini has also reiterated a warning that Italy would take back control of airbases it has authorised for use by allies for operations over Libya unless a NATO coordination structure was agreed.

In a shock admission, U.K. ministers have admitted the intervention in Libya could last for up to ’30 years’.

Asked for an estimate, British Armed Forces Minister Nick Harvey said: ‘How long is a piece of string? We don’t know how long this is going to go on.

‘We don’t know if this is going to result in a stalemate. We don’t know if his capabilities are going to be degraded quickly. Ask me again in a week.’

In the U.S., Obama has made it clear he wants no part of any leadership role in Libya.

The President has already been criticised for continuing with a tour of Latin America as the military operation over Libya began. And yesterday he insisted again that while Gaddafi must go, the U.S. is not prepared to remove him by force, but merely to enforce the no-fly zone.

Even that hesitant stance, which has already earned him the title of the Great Vacillator, left him criticised for not seeking proper approval from Congress before sending the American military in.

And after reports emerged that Gaddafi’s son had been killed in a kamikaze strike yesterday, fresh questions over what exactly the U.S. intends to achieve in Libya emerged.

With Turkey digging its heels in and the Arab League suspicious, it has been pointed out that Mr Obama has fewer coalition partners in Libya than George Bush did at the start of the Iraq war.

He was criticised by both Republicans and Democrats over his decision to commit the U.S. military before going to Congress.

Representatives Jerrold Nadler of New York, Barbara Lee of California, Michael Capuano of Massachusetts, Senators Richard Lugar of Indiana and Rand Paul of Kentucky, and Representative Roscoe Bartlett of Maryland all complained that Mr Obama had exceeded his constitutional authority by authorizing the attack without Congressional permission.

The President hit back in a two-page letter to Congress and again reiterated his claim that while Gaddafi must go, the U.S. was only in Libya to enforce the no-fly zone for the protection of civilians.

France has already taken a leading role in the conflict, with President Nicolas Sarkozy hosting a summit in Paris over the weekend and French bombers being the first to enforce the no-fly zone.

Last night Britain’s top general was embroiled in an extraordinary clash with Downing Street over the legality of a strike to kill Gaddafi.

No 10 slapped down Chief of the Defence Staff General Sir David Richards after he flatly rejected ministers’ suggestions that the Libyan dictator was a legitimate target for assassination.

Downing Street and Foreign Office officials were quick to dispute that – saying assassinating Gaddafi would be legal because it would preserve civilian lives in Libya.

But U.S. Defence Secretary Robert Gates quickly dismissed the suggestion, describing the calls for Gaddafi’s killing ‘unwise’.

Desperately trying to keep the mission on track, he warned that it could undermine the cohesion of the international coalition supporting the no-fly zone.

‘If we start adding additional objectives then I think we create a problem in that respect,’ he said. ‘I also think it is unwise to set as specific goals things that you may or may not be able to achieve.’

Mr Obama has not directly discussed the military action with British Prime Minister David Cameron since it began on Saturday – an omission that would have been unthinkable under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

The public spat just days into the operation highlighted growing tensions about ‘mission creep’ in the assault on Gaddafi.

Meanwhle, the coalition abandoned a further raid by Tornado bombers when SAS soldiers on the ground warned that civilians and journalists were being used as human shields.

And Russian premier Vladimir Putin provocatively likened the UN-backed mission to the medieval crusades.

On Saturday Gaddafi’s son was said to have been killed in a Tomahawk missile strike on the dictator’s compound carried out by the British submarine HMS Triumph.

And soon afterwards, it was reduced to rubble by a precision strike from the 1,000lb weapons. The block was about 150 yards from the tents which the Libyan leader uses as his official residence.

It is not known where the dictator was at the time of the bombing but he has not been seen or heard since the attack. He may have fled into the desert. Senior government sources described the hugely symbolic strike at the heart of his regime as a ‘shot across his bows’.

But there was outright condemnation from Russian premier Vladimir Putin, who gave fuel to Muslim critics of the attacks by branding the UN resolution backing the use of force – a resolution on which Russia abstained – a return to the Crusades.

‘The resolution is defective and flawed,’ said Mr Putin. ‘It allows everything. It resembles medieval calls for crusades.’

Amr Moussa, the secretary-general of the Arab League said that while he supports a no-fly zone, ‘the Arab League was against aerial bombing in principle’.

The North Atlantic Council will meet today to thrash out the differences as every Nato country must agree the plans.

Turkish prime minister Tayyip Erdogan called for air strikes to end ‘as soon as possible’.

‘If Nato is going into operation we have some conditions,’ Mr Erdogan said. ‘Nato should go in with the recognition and acknowledgement that Libya belongs to the Libyans, not for the distribution of its underground resources and wealth.’

Turkey’s foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu said legal procedures for establishing a coalition ‘were not sufficiently respected’ by the West.

Mr Cameron responded: ‘There are millions in the Arab world who frankly want to know that the UN, the U.S., the UK, the French [and] the international community care about their suffering and their oppression.’

Defence officials say Qatari war planes are to join the no-fly zone operation and the United Arab Emirates is being pressured to help too.

Source

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
Germans pull forces out of NATO as Libyan coalition falls apart, 5.0 out of 5 based on 2 ratings
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  


RELATED ARTICLES

Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.
  • Shoah

    Adolf Hitler was right.

    It’s the Jews Stupid.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
  • shalom

    Let israel fight its own wars…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  • Baron Gifilte

    God hates the arab league,they are suicidal.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Baron Gifilte

    God hates queers in number 10.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  • Baron Gifilte

    God hates unnaturally short french impostors.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  • Arrow town2011

    Why hasn’t Libya’s military collapse by now?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Digare

    The very reason why the west involved in Libya is because of the oil they just oil hungry dudes i wonder what the west has been doing while the Sudanese president was killing his Darfur peeps by using a militia-men and yet the close their eyes and let the Rwanda genocide occurred, then the Sieralione, now Ivory Coast, Sudan has no oil so as Rwanda and the rest so the vultures shouldn’t have to be there where there is no blood… In years to come peeps will ought to look for someone like Ghaddafi to lead them and they can’t democracy will failed one-day cause it all hypocrisy…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Hahaha cave man hahaha.They were adnecvad much more then you until nuclear war and flood happened and killed them.They were white people more then 170cm tall who had children on North Americas continent.Those children were also Native Americas people.They were nothing different then most Europians.Later Indians outnumbered them and murdered them in all Indians stories and many whites became red because of climate.Point is that they sailed with boats from Europe to North America.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Romarico C.Garcia

    I am confuse now the meaning of a Dictator, is this now a dictator.Please look who are really the dictator.To me I think it is an opportunistic world used by a selfish greed.A blind intent to destabilize a country where true democracy practiced.What government Libya have. It is Socialist Peoples Libyan Arab,Jamahiriya.It is compose of Peoples in the community who makes thir laws.I was there for 5 years ang one of OFW Medical Society Representatives in the Peoples Congress ,as a representatives I bring the problem of Filipino Nurses OFW and they granted it.Their people have free education,free medical attention and treatment ,if cannot be treated in a hospital who is not for the case ,I am the one attend transferring Patient by using Modern Helicopters,ang if to be transported to other country they used Private Jets one of that case is Yugoslavian patient working as Janitor at IBN Sina Hosital,Sirt,Libya.Housing provided by the govt.All Libyans have equal rights.Now I am really conclude what happened in Libya happened in my country overtrow a very good Pres.Marcos.What I am feeling now.I am now believe within this system No Human rights in this world.Remember our God always see us.All this big Shark will be eaten by the same shark,one day they will be victim of themselves.I am not for anyone but For Human Rights ,Equal Rights in this world.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  • John Doe

    It’s all a load of sheet. They want to get rid of Ghaddafi because he is not following into line. Maybe the Mediterranean Union has something to do with it. He has already stated that J F Kennedy was killed because of Israel’s nuclear weapons program, he has stated that Al-Qaeda is pure fiction and seems to anti-israel. He is not an idiot. He basically has not fallen into line with our western occupying snakes, so they have decided to make up crap and try to get rid of the guy. It has to be the biggest back stab in history. If Iran had allies, it would most likely strike western forces in Afghanistan and Iraq. Just watch out if Russia and China join forces! The West is cor-put, Bankers, Media and Politicians are all on the 30 peaces of shekels a week.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  • RAM

    TO THE ABOVE…SUDAN DOES HAVE OIL ITS JUST IN THE SOUTH. SUDAN HASA ALEADY SIGNED THEIR OIL RIGHTS OVER TO THE SAUDI’S AS OF PAST 12 MONTHS OR SO. SAUDI’S/OTHERS APPEAR TO BE FUNDING THE NORTH FOR YEARS ‘WHICH IS MUSLIM” THE CROOKED PRESIDENT PLAYS BOTH SIDES BUT REALLY THE ARAB SIDE AS YOU SEE. THE SOUTH IS THE NATIVE AFRICA PEOPLE OR TO THE ARAB’S THE “SERVANTS’… JUST LIKE AMERICAN INDIAN DAYS OF SETTLEMENT OF THE USA. THE REASON USA DOESNT GET INVOLVED IS FOR THIS REASON. ALLIES HAVE BOUGHT THE ASSETS AND ITS HANDS OFF. SPREAD SOME AIDS, SPREAD SOME AID, KILL OFF THE NATIVES BY THE MILLIONS OVER TIME NOBODY REALLY CARES POLICY….WHEN WE NEED THE OIL AND GOLD FROM THE SOUTH WE’LL START DRILLING. THIS IS WHY LIBYA CAN BE A “HUMANITARIAN” ISSUE AND OTHERS IN AFRICA, LIKE THE IVORY COAST, DONT MATTER. LIBYA OIL IS LIBYA OIL. LIBYA LEADER DOESNT STAND FOR “GET OUT” TACTICS. AND HE SHOULDNT. ENERGY AND CURRENCY WAR PAST FEW YEARS AS MENTIONED IS CATCHING ON TO BILLY BOB AND HIS COMMON FOLK. THATS ALL THIS IS AND WHY EVENTUALLY THE BLOGS LIKE THIS WILL BE NO MORE. LOOK IT UP FOR YOURSELF THERE IS AT LEAST ONE PRINCE FROM THE ROYAL FAMILY STATING 5 BILLION FOR SUDAN. THIS ISNT TO PLANT CHRISTMAS TREE’S FOR THE CHRISTIAN NATIVES IN THE SOUTH….

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Eric of Colorado

    As an American military veteran I believe it is repulsive to have an American government that uses its military to exploit the American people and rob and destroy our neighbors in the world community. Most members of the US military believe the same. The government of the USA is worse than the Nazi German government. :oops:

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
Copyright © 2009 The European Union Times – Breaking News, Latest News. All rights reserved.