<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Germany really lost World War II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eutimes.net/2010/01/why-germany-really-lost-world-war-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eutimes.net/2010/01/why-germany-really-lost-world-war-ii/</link>
	<description>EU Times delivers world breaking news and information on the latest top stories, economy, entertainment, politics, and more. Updated 1 minute ago.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve B</title>
		<link>http://www.eutimes.net/2010/01/why-germany-really-lost-world-war-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-36449</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eutimes.net/?p=4448#comment-36449</guid>
		<description>Very good article,but as with many it failed to mention the resources used and were diverted for the NAZI FINAL SOULTION, because the Allies attached great inportance to the time and materials that were needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article,but as with many it failed to mention the resources used and were diverted for the NAZI FINAL SOULTION, because the Allies attached great inportance to the time and materials that were needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.eutimes.net/2010/01/why-germany-really-lost-world-war-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-15725</link>
		<dc:creator>John Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eutimes.net/?p=4448#comment-15725</guid>
		<description>And they say we&#039;re not in Iraq over oil?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And they say we&#8217;re not in Iraq over oil?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoseB</title>
		<link>http://www.eutimes.net/2010/01/why-germany-really-lost-world-war-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-10868</link>
		<dc:creator>RoseB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 05:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eutimes.net/?p=4448#comment-10868</guid>
		<description>This article can be found here: 
 
M.Antonucci,&#039;The Quest for Fuel in World War Two&#039;,http://www.eiaonline.com/history/bloodforoil.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article can be found here: </p>
<p>M.Antonucci,&#8217;The Quest for Fuel in World War Two&#8217;,<a href="http://www.eiaonline.com/history/bloodforoil.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.eiaonline.com/history/bloodforoil.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Robisheaux</title>
		<link>http://www.eutimes.net/2010/01/why-germany-really-lost-world-war-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-5440</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Robisheaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eutimes.net/?p=4448#comment-5440</guid>
		<description>I would really like some sourcing information on this article. This is one of the most interesting articles on the War I&#039;ve read in years, but I want sourcing. And I would like to know who wrote this article. This is blockbuster stuff. I really would appreciate it if the author could contact me so I can ask additional questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would really like some sourcing information on this article. This is one of the most interesting articles on the War I&#8217;ve read in years, but I want sourcing. And I would like to know who wrote this article. This is blockbuster stuff. I really would appreciate it if the author could contact me so I can ask additional questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerraHertz</title>
		<link>http://www.eutimes.net/2010/01/why-germany-really-lost-world-war-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-5352</link>
		<dc:creator>TerraHertz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eutimes.net/?p=4448#comment-5352</guid>
		<description>Fascinating.
My only criticism of the article is that it omits what is now known about the initiation of war in the Pacific. That the USA leadership desired a Japanese &#039;surprise&#039; attack, with a large US initial loss, in order to enrage US public opinion and enable US entry into the war in Europe. That Pearl Harbor was effectively a set-up, and the FDR government knew of the attack time at least a week beforehand. Ref &#039;The McCollum memo&#039;, etc.

Very intriguing detail in this article, that the Japanese attack on Peal deliberately omitted to destroy the US&#039;s sole Pacific fuel depot. Hmmm....

Lets hope no one ever invents fusion powered warcraft. There&#039;d be no end to wars then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating.<br />
My only criticism of the article is that it omits what is now known about the initiation of war in the Pacific. That the USA leadership desired a Japanese &#8216;surprise&#8217; attack, with a large US initial loss, in order to enrage US public opinion and enable US entry into the war in Europe. That Pearl Harbor was effectively a set-up, and the FDR government knew of the attack time at least a week beforehand. Ref &#8216;The McCollum memo&#8217;, etc.</p>
<p>Very intriguing detail in this article, that the Japanese attack on Peal deliberately omitted to destroy the US&#8217;s sole Pacific fuel depot. Hmmm&#8230;.</p>
<p>Lets hope no one ever invents fusion powered warcraft. There&#8217;d be no end to wars then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitris Michalopoulos</title>
		<link>http://www.eutimes.net/2010/01/why-germany-really-lost-world-war-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-5286</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitris Michalopoulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eutimes.net/?p=4448#comment-5286</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent article. It highlights moreover the reason of the 1940 Italian attack on Greece. Great Britain wanted Greece to be involved in the war; for the British aircrafts wanted Greek airports in order to destroy Ploiesti.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent article. It highlights moreover the reason of the 1940 Italian attack on Greece. Great Britain wanted Greece to be involved in the war; for the British aircrafts wanted Greek airports in order to destroy Ploiesti.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://www.eutimes.net/2010/01/why-germany-really-lost-world-war-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-5253</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eutimes.net/?p=4448#comment-5253</guid>
		<description>There were many losses in Roumania at Ploiesti refinery
It is intresting how in Roumania not much people is talking about this ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were many losses in Roumania at Ploiesti refinery<br />
It is intresting how in Roumania not much people is talking about this &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

