Here is how I see JamestheJust, who is JUST a couple of sandwiches shy of a complete picnic.

“hoot hoot jesus, hoot hoot love, hoot hoot asswipes, hoot hoot sissies, hoot hoot out of context, hoot hoot jews, hoot hoot I’m a genius!”

Poor old jamesthejerk, no one takes a fool seriously.

Go ahead now and show us just how vulgar you can truly be. Push an ignorant bible thumper into a corner and they will quickly show their true colors. It makes them mad as hell when a non believer knows the bible better than they do.

Don’t ever try to go into detective work. You are a miserable failure.

Globe Arizona? LOL!

Well then, it is hardly necessary to refute or explain the scriptures you have wrongly interpreted or have taken out of context, since you will not read them or respond.

I will, however, respond to each of your falsehoods, (whether deliberate or not) just as soon as I return from work. (no I am not going away)

You miss the ESSENTIAL underlying message of the scripture. You do not understand the nature of the ongoing battle and those who do not understand the foundation, cannot make sense of the building.

(Numbers 31:7-18 NLT)

They attacked Midian just as the LORD had commanded Moses, and they killed all the men. All five of the Midianite kings – Evi, Rekem, Zur, Hur, and Reba – died in the battle. They also killed Balaam son of Beor with the sword. Then the Israelite army captured the Midianite women and children and seized their cattle and flocks and all their wealth as plunder. They burned all the towns and villages where the Midianites had lived. After they had gathered the plunder and captives, both people and animals, they brought them all to Moses and Eleazar the priest, and to the whole community of Israel, which was camped on the plains of Moab beside the Jordan River, across from Jericho.

Moses, Eleazar the priest, and all the leaders of the people went to meet them outside the camp. But Moses was furious with all the military commanders who had returned from the battle.”Why have you let all the women live?” he demanded. “These are the very ones who followed Balaam’s advice and caused the people of Israel to rebel against the LORD at Mount Peor. They are the ones who caused the plague to strike the LORD’s people. Now kill all the boys and all the women who have slept with a man. Only the young girls who are virgins may live; you may keep them for yourselves.

Clearly Moses and God approves of rape of virgins.(To understand the method of proving who was a virgin go to the Talmud which tells how they fingered all the women and girls to see if they bled as a virgin would do. These are sick bastards following a sick bastard son of a bitch demon god and only a goddamn fool would follow such a devil.

More Murder Rape and Pillage (Deuteronomy 20:10-14)

As you approach a town to attack it, first offer its people terms for peace. If they accept your terms and open the gates to you, then all the people inside will serve you in forced labor. But if they refuse to make peace and prepare to fight, you must attack the town. When the LORD your God hands it over to you, kill every man in the town. But you may keep for yourselves all the women, children, livestock, and other plunder. You may enjoy the spoils of your enemies that the LORD your God has given you.

What kind of God approves of murder, rape, and slavery?

Laws of Rape (Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT)

If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker? Answer: The sick perverted christian demon God.

Death to the Rape Victim (Deuteronomy 22:23-24 NAB)

If within the city a man comes upon a maiden who is betrothed, and has relations with her, you shall bring them both out of the gate of the city and there stone them to death: the girl because she did not cry out for help though she was in the city, and the man because he violated his neighbors wife.

It is clear that God doesn’t give a damn about the rape victim. He is only concerned about the violation of another mans “property”.

The bible is one of the most perverse books of hate and cruelty ever written by man. Only a goddamn fool would accept this filth as the word of a just god. James, this means you!

Oh, ans jamesthejustinsane, jesus was buried on a Friday evening and rose on the next Sunday morning. Even a fool can count that as a day and a half so how in the hell do you imbeciles come up with three days and three nights like Jonah?! At best that is a day and a half and that is in your bible. The four gospel writters could not even agree on their stories and they are the only eye-witnesses of these events and it took them years to put their various accounts into words.

OT prophecies of j-zuz? I think not! The OT warns of j-zuz.

“I am the LORD [Yahweh], and besides me there is no savior.” (Isaiah 43:11)
“They have no knowledge who carry about their wooden idols [i.e., crucifixes] and keep on praying to a god that cannot save.” (Isaiah 45:20)
“Write this man down as childless, a man who shall not succeed in his days; for none of his offspring shall succeed in sitting on the throne of David, and ruling again in Judah.” (Jeremiah 22:30)
“The men of Memphis and Tahpanhes have broken the crown of your head. Have you not brought this upon yourself by forsaking the LORD your God when he led you in the way?” (Jeremiah 2:16-17) [In Matthew 27:29-30 Jesus was beaten about the head while wearing the crown of thorns.]
“But what is left over from the flesh of the sacrifice on the third day shall be burned with fire.” (Leviticus 7:17) [i.e., Jesus did not rise from the dead on the third day, but was sent to burn in hell.]
“You are cast out, away from your sepulchre, like a loathed untimely birth, clothed with the slain, those pierced by the sword, who go down to the stones of the pit.” (Isaiah 14:18-19) [Explains the empty tomb, and getting pierced in the side.]
“God is not a man, that he should lie, nor a son of man, that he should repent.” (Numbers 23:19) [Jesus often referred to himself as the "son of man."]
“Who are you that you are afraid of man who dies, of the son of man who is made like grass, and have forgotten the LORD, your maker, who stretched out the heavens and laid the foundations of the earth?” (Isaiah 51:12-13)
“A deluded mind has led him astray.” (Isaiah 44:20) [Recall Mark 3:21, where even in Jesus's hometown people were saying, "He is beside himself."]

The number one so-called prophecy of j-zuz in the OT was long ago proven to be a total farce by Thomas Paine in his Age of Reason and I now quote from that work that has never been refuted.

“The verses that follow those I have quoted, are the words of the writer of the book of Matthew. “Now [says he] all this [that is, all this dreaming and this pregnancy] was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the Prophet, saying, Behold a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted, is, God with us.”

This passage is in Isaiah vii, 14, and the writer of the book of Matthew endeavors to make his readers believe that this passage is a prophecy of the person called Jesus Christ. It is no such thing, and I go to show it is not. But it is first necessary that I explain the occasion of these words being spoken by Isaiah. The reader will then easily perceive that so far from their being a prophecy of Jesus Christ, they have not the least reference to such a person, nor to anything that could happen in the time that Christ is said to have lived, which was about seven hundred years after the time of Isaiah. The case is this:

On the death of Solomon the Jewish nation split into two monarchies: one called the kingdom of Judah, the capital of which was Jerusalem: the other the kingdom of Israel, the capital of which was Samaria. The kingdom of Judah followed the line of David, and the kingdom of Israel that of Saul; and these two rival monarchies frequently carried on fierce wars against each other.

At this time Ahaz was King of Judah, which was in the time of Isaiah, Pekah was King of Israel; and Pekah joined himself to Rezin, King of Syria, to make war against Ahaz, King of Judah; and these two kings marched a confederated and powerful army against Jerusalem. Ahaz and his people became alarmed at their danger, and “their hearts were moved as the trees of the wood are moved with the wind.” Isaiah vii, 3.

In this perilous situation of things, Isaiah addresses himself to Ahaz, and assures him in the name of the Lord (the cant phrase of all the prophets), that these two kings should not succeed against him; and to assure him that this should be the case (the case was however directly contrary) tells Ahaz to ask a sign of the Lord.

This Ahaz declined doing, giving as a reason, that he would not tempt the Lord; upon which Isaiah, who pretends to be sent from God, says, verse 14, “Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign, behold a virgin shall conceive and bear a son – butter and honey shall he eat, that he may know to refuse the evil and choose the good – for before the child shall know to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land which thou abhorrest shall be forsaken of both her kings” – meaning the King of Israel and the King of Syria who were marching against him.

Here then is the sign, which was to be the birth of a child, and that child a son; and here also is the time limited for the accomplishment of the sign, namely, before the child should know to refuse the evil and choose the good.

The thing, therefore, to be a sign of success to Ahaz, must be something that would take place before the event of the battle then pending between him and the two kings could be known. A thing to be a sign must precede the thing signified. The sign of rain must be before the rain.

It would have been mockery and insulting nonsense for Isaiah to have assured Ahaz a sign that these two things should not prevail against him, that a child should be born seven hundred years after he was dead, and that before the child so born should know to refuse the evil and choose the good, he, Ahaz, should be delivered from the danger he was then immediately threatened with.

But the case is, that the child of which Isaiah speaks was his own child, with which his wife or his mistress was then pregnant; for he says in the next chapter (Is. vii, 2), “And I took unto me faithful witnesses to record, Uriah the priest, and Zechariah the son of Jeberechiah; and I went unto the prophetess, and she conceived and bear a son;” and he says, at verse 18 of the same chapter, “Behold I and the children whom the Lord hath given me are for signs and for wonders in Israel.”

It may not be improper here to observe, that the word translated a virgin in Isaiah, doe not signify a virgin in Hebrew, but merely a young woman. The tense is also falsified in the translation. Levi gives the Hebrew text of Isaiah vii, 14, and the translation in English with it – “Behold a young woman is with child and beareth a son.” The expression, says he, is in the present tense.

This translation agrees with the other circumstances related of the birth of this child which was to be a sign to Ahaz. But as the true translation could not have been imposed upon the world as a prophecy of a child to be born seven hundred years afterwards, the Christian translators have falsified the original: and instead of making Isaiah to say, behold a young woman IS with child and beareth a son, they have made him to say, “Behold a virgin shall conceive and bear a son.”

I suggest you read ‘The Christ Scandal’ by Tony Bushby and at least get a clue about the religion you have been brainwashed to accept. I will no longer read your posts or try to enligthen you. If you love your enslavement then knock yourself out but spare the rest of us from your ignorance and go away, far away.

All you seem to be able to do is call people names since you have NO KNOWLEDGE while trying to pass yourself off as an authority on something you do not even believe in the first place.

And stop trying to displace blame. YOU are the one who brought the subject up. Then you try to say its someone else’s fault.

You’re a jew right? You certainly sound like one.

And BTW, if you and Ed don’t like the post I make then don’t read them. You guys sound like little sissies.

I will keep posting and I will keep teaching what I know. If you two panty waists don’t like it…TOUGH!

You are a sad little man and I will prove just how dumb you are.

You are a pathetic little troll. Give it your best shot ass wipe.